Skip to content
Review Open access

Validity and Reliability of the Medical Artificial Intelligence Readiness Scale, Korean Version: A Methodological and Cross-Sectional Study.

Aug 2026 · Nursing and Health Sciences · Vol 28 3, pp. e70402 · 0 citations · 23 references
Medicine

TL;DR

The K-MAIRS can be a valid and reliable instrument for assessing artificial intelligence readiness among Korean nursing students and supports global initiatives to incorporate artificial intelligence competencies into nursing education using culturally tailored assessment tools.

Abstract

This study aimed to translate and culturally adapt the Medical Artificial Intelligence Readiness Scale for Medical Students into Korean and to examine its validity and reliability among nursing students. The scale designed in this methodological and cross-sectional study was translated and adapted using standard procedures and validated with 317 nursing students in South Korea. Experts reviewed the content validity. Structural validity was examined through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Construct validity was evaluated through hypothesis testing using an external criterion measure. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and the split-half method. The final Korean version of the Medical Artificial Intelligence Readiness Scale (K-MAIRS) comprised 15 items across four factors-cognition, ability, vision, and ethics-explaining 66.88% of the variance. The K-MAIRS can be a valid and reliable instrument for assessing artificial intelligence readiness among Korean nursing students. This instrument supports global initiatives to incorporate artificial intelligence competencies into nursing education using culturally tailored assessment tools. It also supports educators and institutions in designing targeted strategies for artificial intelligence education within nursing curricula that enhance nurses' preparedness in artificial intelligence-driven healthcare environments.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Jan 2026

Cross‐Cultural Applicability and Application of the Nursing Leaders’ Readiness for Artificial Intelligence Scale: A Cross‐Sectional Study

The Chinese‐version scale demonstrated good reliability and validity and can effectively assess AI readiness among Chinese nursing managers, providing a standard measurement tool for Chinese hospitals to check how ready their nursing managers are for AI.

Hui Yang, Yuanzhi Guo, Yaxin Qiao et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Development and psychometric validation of the Thai AI Literacy Scale for Nursing Students in Thailand: a cross-sectional observational study.

The TAILS-NS provides evidence of validity and reliability for measuring AI literacy among Thai nursing students and may serve as a standardized tool for curriculum evaluation.

Wannaporn Jongchidklang, Supalak Phonphithak, P. Amornritvanich · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Validity and Reliability of the “Self-Assessment of Informatics Competency Scale for Health Professionals”: A Methodological Study

Current research shows that the Turkish adaptation of SÇ-BYÖDÖ is a valid and reliable tool that suggests a practical method to assess informatics self-efficacy among health workers and may significantly contribute to the development of digital competency in Türkiye’s health system.

Nurhan Bingöl, Fatoş Korkmaz · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Development of the nursing artificial intelligence readiness scale for nursing students: a validity and reliability study.

Initial evidence is provided that the NAIRS is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing nursing students' readiness for artificial intelligence across knowledge/awareness, willingness to use AI, self-efficacy, and ethical awareness domains and may be useful for educational needs assessment and curriculum planning in nursing education.

Sumeyye Akçoban, Gülay Koca, S. Berşe · 0 citations