Jul 2026· International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks· pp. 1-9· 0 citations· 16 references
Abstract
Priority scheduling techniques aim to schedule tasks with higher priority and tighter deadlines to be executed before other tasks. However, traditional blockchain systems do not work well with priority scheduling due to issues regarding consensus mechanisms, throughput, and scalability. In this work, we propose three transaction scheduling schemes which employ a fee-based model to differentiate priority levels of transactions and select transactions for validation and inclusion based on criteria other than the order of arrival. The Priority-Based Scheduling scheme focuses on the priority level of individual transactions, the Contract-Based Scheduling scheme emphasizes the satisfaction of more customer contracts, whereas the Latency-Based Scheduling scheme prioritizes transactions with closer deadlines when bursts of transactions overwhelm the blockchain network. We implement prototypes of our transaction scheduling schemes in a private Algorand-inspired simulation and evaluate their performance by testing them under scenarios representing different transaction distribution ratios. The results show that the three transaction scheduling schemes outperform the baseline in which no scheduling is applied, and each scheme performs best in the transaction distribution scenario it is designed to handle.
This work proposes the blockchain-based proportional fair scheduling (BC-PFS) that enables trustworthy inter-network coordination and resource pooling across operators in O-RAN and designs four core smart contracts including registration, status reporting, scheduling, and settlement contracts with corresponding Solidit...
Kun Huang, Xintong Ling, Mei-Ning Wu et al.· 0 citations
Existing sharded blockchain systems suffer from excessive cross-shard communication overhead and workload imbalance. Although state-of-the-art account allocation schemes partially alleviate these problems, they still fail to simultaneously achieve effective cross-shard transaction reduction and balanced workload distri...
Zitong Zhang, Hao-Xiang Han, Chao-Ming Shi et al.· IEEE Transactions on Network...· 0 citations
The proposed OIBTO framework employs a lightweight Proof-of-Authority consensus within a two-tier architecture consisting of a vehicle layer and an edge layer, and proposes an Improved Starfish Optimization Algorithm (ISFOA) that utilizes chaotic mapping and genetic mutation to optimize offloading decisions and task pa...
A web-based expert system designed to support the selection of blockchain consensus mechanisms according to specific user-defined operational requirements, which contributes a transparent and extensible decision-support framework intended to simplify architectural planning and management of blockchain-based distributed...
Ivica Lukić, Nikola Ramčić, Iván Ivkovic et al.· Network· 0 citations
The improved consensus gave clarity on how to scale without compromising security or decentralization proves that the improved consensus gave clarity on how to scale without compromising security or decentralization.
Kolli Lalitha Kumari, P. Kumari· Sigma Journal of Engineering...· 0 citations
The classification system of distributed consensus algorithms is analyzed and Byzantine fault-tolerant and non-Byzantine fault-tolerant are divided into two major categories based on fault models: Byzantine fault-tolerant and non-Byzantine fault-tolerant.
Y. Rao· Mathematical Modeling and Al...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.