Aug 2026· Qubahan Academic Journal· 0 citations· 15 references
TL;DR
The four proposed management models are grounded in established theories of organizational change, digital transformation, and institutional governance, providing a conceptual framework for understanding how educational institutions can implement digital transformation effectively.
Abstract
Digital transformation in education requires adaptive management models that align institutional strategy with technological change and human-capital development. This study aims to systematize and classify management models of digital transformation in Kazakhstan’s education sector. A mixed-methods approach was applied: a survey of 250 administrators from schools, colleges, and universities (2024), expert interviews with policy makers, and Pearson correlation analysis to assess relationships between digital maturity, leadership competencies, financing, and the adoption of analytics-driven tools. Results show that only 27% of institutions have formal digital strategies, while digital maturity strongly correlates with the number of implemented solutions (r = 0.72) and managers’ digital competence (r = 0.71). Regional disparities persist: access to high-speed internet reaches 92% in Almaty but only 60% in Atyrau. The study proposes four types of management models—innovative-adaptive, platform-oriented, process-modular, and hybrid—and outlines conditions for their application. Findings provide evidence-based guidance for policy-makers and institutional leaders to advance equitable, analytics-driven digital transformation. The four proposed management models are grounded in established theories of organizational change, digital transformation, and institutional governance, providing a conceptual framework for understanding how educational institutions can implement digital transformation effectively.
A diagnostic toolkit and optimization matrix for the information and educational system (IES) have been developed, enabling the transition from fragmented digitalization to the architecture of a holistic educational ecosystem.
A. S. Yusupova, Zareta Shaayevna Abubakarova· ACCOUNTING AND CONTROL· 0 citations
The results indicate that the management of digital transformation across accredited PHEIs in the Greater Manila Area is strongest where it depends on leadership commitment, professional development, and user-facing engagement, and comparatively weaker where it depends on formal documentation, sustained financing, stan...
Maribel Astucia Estepa, RL, Msls· International journal of res...· 0 citations
It is concluded that technology transfer represents a viable strategy for accelerating digital transformation and strengthening innovation in higher education institutions.
Raquel Rosas-Vega, John Henry RojasAlonzo, Baltazar de Jesús Zapata-Arceo et al.· Journal of Systems and Educa...· 0 citations
The article explores the characteristics and key vectors of transforming the educational management of a modern higher education institution (HEI) on an innovative basis. The limitations of the traditional hierarchical-bureaucratic administration model under high external turbulence, digitalization, security challenges...
Yevheniia Vorobieva, Alina Khrypunova, Mykola Chebotariov· Bulletin of the National Tec...· 0 citations
A dynamic normative management model linking instructional design directly to economic key performance indicators is justified and it is proved that process-oriented transformation reduces course development cycles by 30-40%, eliminates transaction delays, and increases overall educational product value.
G. R. Kadyrbaeva, R. V. Obodets· Beneficium· 0 citations
The industry 4.0 revolution and Society 5.0 have brought profound disruption to the non-formal education sector, demanding technological adaptation within highly dynamic landscapes. Despite the value of existing literature, a significant research gap persists as studies often evaluate digital marketing, online course d...