Experiments on ImageNet across multiple ViT architectures and attacks show that decoys can redirect high attention scores away from the true adversarial region while preserving much of the attack effectiveness, revealing a fundamental limitation of using attention magnitude as an indicator of adversarial relevance.
Abstract
Vision Transformers (ViTs) remain vulnerable to localized adversarial attacks, e.g., adversarial patches, while recent test-time defenses mitigate them by suppressing image tokens with abnormally high attention scores. These defenses exploit a strong coupling between attention and adversarial effectiveness: adversarial tokens often need to attract substantial attention to influence the prediction. We introduce adversarial decoys, independently optimized image patches that redirect the attention, and therefore related defenses, toward selected target tokens. Rather than jointly optimizing misclassifications and defense evasion, our approach decouples the two objectives: the original adversarial region induces the incorrect prediction, while a separate decoy manipulates the attention ranking used by the defense. A layer-wise objective increases target-token attention and promotes these tokens above competing non-target ones. Since the decoy is optimized independently of the underlying attack, the method is attack-agnostic and can be easily integrated with any existing adversarial patch attack. Experiments on ImageNet across multiple ViT architectures and attacks show that decoys can redirect high attention scores away from the true adversarial region while preserving much of the attack effectiveness. These results reveal a fundamental limitation of using attention magnitude as an indicator of adversarial relevance.
This paper introduces the first attack that directly optimizes an encoder-attention objective under an imperceptible, bounded, bounded perturbation, and argues that encoder attention concentrates the model's spatial reasoning, so corrupting it propagates through the detection pipeline more disruptively than perturbing...
Ridma Jayasundara, Shaheer Mohamed, Tharindu Fernando et al.· 0 citations
The defense effect of GVAT was generalized to other attacks under the transfer-based black-box setting, which showed that GVAT not only defended against the corresponding attacks that generated adversarial examples but also defended against other attacks.
A novel, training-free adversarial defense method called Edge-Guided Prompt Defense (EGP-Defense), which performs adversarial defense during the model inference stage, and significantly improves the robustness of LVLMs against three types of adversarial attacks in both image classification and image caption tasks.
Bo-Yu Wang, Zi-Wen He, Xin-Jue Hu et al.· ACM Transactions on Multimed...· 0 citations
This survey examines a recent class of adversarial efficiency degradation attacks that target these mechanisms to increase computation without necessarily degrading accuracy, and unify and compare two representative attacks across three popular token-pruning frameworks.
Anadi Goyal, Nandish Chattopadhyay, Anupam Chattopadhyay et al.· 0 citations
This paper introduces DefendMal, a novel framework that synergistically combines Denoise Autoencoder with Sequence Squeezing, a Context-aware Adversarial Generator (CAG-AdvGAN), Projected Gradient Descent (PGD) adversarial training, and a Positive–Negative Detector with Variational Autoencoder (PNDetector-VAE) to enhan...
Dennis Benedict Crasta, Vikash Kumar· Journal of Computer Virology...· 0 citations
InsCAT is proposed, an instance-level contrastive adversarial training framework that prevents detectors from using adversarial texture as an independent decision cue, and consistent gains across separately trained detectors demonstrate applicability across architectures with direct inference.
Yuanhao Huang, Yi-Long Ren, Jin-Lei Wang et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.