Trustworthy Visual Quality Inspection under Data Scarcity in Manufacturing

Abstract

Automated visual inspection in manufacturing aims to replace slow and inconsistent manual checks, but its economic value depends on whether its decisions can be trusted enough to automate routine inspection while reserving human expertise for ambiguous cases. In production-line settings, defective samples are scarce, since the process is optimized to produce good parts, which limits any learning-based inspector trained on real data alone. Compounding this, defect decisions emitted as hard labels with no confidence estimate carry an asymmetric cost: a false reject wastes a good product, while a false accept may increase the risk of undetected defects progressing through the production process. We address both problems by mitigating data scarcity through the generation of synthetic defective samples with a diffusion model, and meeting the need for confidence-aware decisions with a Bayesian classifier that defers ambiguous units to human review rather than misclassifying them. These components are embedded in a staged pipeline of successive, complementary checks. We evaluate how synthetic augmentation affects classification and localization on a test set of real defects, and examine the system's trustworthiness at three points: the decision, the synthetic data, and the pipeline structure. This work-in-progress reports preliminary results suggesting that diffusion-generated defects, combined with uncertainty-aware classification, can lower the cost of reaching a trustworthy, deployable inspection model under data scarcity.