2026· E3S Web of Conferences· 0 citations· 22 references
Abstract
Earthquake-induced soil liquefaction is a major cause of embankment failure. To mitigate this hazard, geosynthetic encased stone column (GESC) has gained increasing attention as an effective ground improvement technique for liquefiable soils. By providing additional radial confinement through the geosynthetic encasement, GESC exhibits higher strength and stiffness compared with conventional stone columns, thereby enhancing the stability and deformation resistance of the improved ground. In this study, a three-dimensional numerical model was developed using FLAC3D to investigate the influence of liquefiable layer thickness on the seismic response of GESC supported embankments. The soil and stone columns were simulated using a pressure-dependent multi-yield surface constitutive model, while the geosynthetic encasement was represented by a linearly elastic geogrid element. The results reveal that the liquefiable layer thickness plays a critical role in controlling the seismic performance of GESC supported embankments. A thicker liquefiable layer leads to greater shear deformation within the foundation and larger embankment settlements, as well as higher tensile strains in the geosynthetic encasement, particularly near the bottom of the liquefiable layer. These findings highlight the importance of considering the effect of liquefiable layer thickness in the design of GESC supported embankments to achieve improved seismic stability and deformation control.
Soft soil conditions present significant challenges to the seismic performance of transportation infrastructure, particularly box culverts constructed in earthquake-prone regions. This study evaluates the effectiveness of galam timber piles in improving the stability and reducing the settlement of a pile-supported box...
Arief Alihudien, Muhammad Ilham Satritama, Naufal Hadardien Haq et al.· Journal of Geoscience, Engin...· 0 citations
The force-equilibrium-based Finite Displacement Method (FFDM) and the conventional Newmark’s method are reviewed and applied to three revisited sites of geosynthetic reinforced soil retaining walls (GRSW) subjected to strong ground shaking. The strengths and limitations of both methods are examined through their pred...
Ching-Chuan Huang, Hung-Yi Hsieh, Ianatul Hamdiyah et al.· E3S Web of Conferences· 0 citations
Conventional assessments of soil liquefaction risk are based on simplified methods using penetration test results. In this approach, soil density is estimated from penetration resistance, and liquefaction strength is calculated based on the estimated soil density. However, this method primarily evaluates risks associat...
Y. Kawamata, K. Tsurugasaki, J. Miyamoto et al.· Journal of Disaster Research· 0 citations
This paper assesses the liquefaction susceptibility of dispersive soils in the city of Termez, southern Uzbekistan, an area subject to transit seismic effects from several surrounding seismogenic zones with magnitudes up to Mmax = 7.5. Engineering-geological investigations to a depth of 50 m identified three engineerin...
J. Bozorov, X. Isroilov, A. Mansurov et al.· E3S Web of Conferences· 0 citations
Soft soils can be improved with granular columns to increase load-bearing capacity and reduce embankment settlements. However, conventional columns often undergo excessive lateral deformation near the top due to the low confinement provided by very soft soils. Geosynthetic encasement overcomes this limitation by offeri...
Jaime Alberto Suárez Moreno, Gregório Luís Silva Araújo, E. Palmeira· E3S Web of Conferences· 0 citations
Background: Previous liquefaction studies along the West Sumatera coast have mainly focused on the Padang urban area and have relied on triggering analysis using CSR–CRR. However, post-liquefaction ground deformation, which can affect coastal defense infrastructure, has received limited attention. This study addresses...
Okri Asfino Putra, Hamdeni Medriosa, F. Nugroho· International Journal of App...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.