Oct 2026· Journal of Disaster Research· Vol 21, pp. 880-891· 0 citations· 12 references
Abstract
Conventional assessments of soil liquefaction risk are based on simplified methods using penetration test results. In this approach, soil density is estimated from penetration resistance, and liquefaction strength is calculated based on the estimated soil density. However, this method primarily evaluates risks associated with excess pore water pressure build-up during an earthquake and does not account for changes in water pressure caused by the movement of pore water during and after the earthquake. It is anticipated these effects will be significant when an impermeable layer exists at or below the ground surface, or when long duration seismic motion occurs. Considering the above, two cases of geotechnical centrifugal model tests with and without impermeable surface layer were performed to evaluate its influence on the liquefaction behaviors of soil strata. Long duration sinusoidal motions of various intensities were applied to the specimens. Based on the test results, the surface layer permeability had a significant influence on pore water pressure buildup in the liquefiable strata beneath the surface layer, especially in the shallower portion of the soil. In addition, by plotting the relationships between response accelerations and excess pore water pressure, the liquefaction strength of the ground was assessed. These relationships showed a high potential for evaluating the liquefaction strength of “geo-structures,” and consider not only the properties of “geo-material” determined from cyclic triaxial tests but also the influence of surface layer permeability. Defining the geo-structural liquefaction strength under various conditions is expected to lead to the establishment of a more reasonable method for assessing soil liquefaction risk.
Earthquake-induced soil liquefaction poses a severe threat to the structural safety of underground infrastructure. This paper presents a shaking table model test conducted on sand sites, where two site models—namely, uniform saturated sand and layered dry–saturated sand—are designed to systematically analyze the influe...
Yixiong Gan, Ye Cheng, Jinghu Yang et al.· Engineer· 0 citations
This paper assesses the liquefaction susceptibility of dispersive soils in the city of Termez, southern Uzbekistan, an area subject to transit seismic effects from several surrounding seismogenic zones with magnitudes up to Mmax = 7.5. Engineering-geological investigations to a depth of 50 m identified three engineerin...
J. Bozorov, X. Isroilov, A. Mansurov et al.· E3S Web of Conferences· 0 citations
Earthquake-induced soil liquefaction is a major cause of embankment failure. To mitigate this hazard, geosynthetic encased stone column (GESC) has gained increasing attention as an effective ground improvement technique for liquefiable soils. By providing additional radial confinement through the geosynthetic encasemen...
Ming-Chang Ji, Fu-Xiu Li, Hai-Zuo Zhou et al.· E3S Web of Conferences· 0 citations
Groundwater conditions can alter the effective stress state and mass characteristics of foundation soils and thereby influence seismic soil–structure interaction. This study evaluated the effect of groundwater level (GWL) on the seismic response of a multistory building–soil system using three-dimensional finite-elemen...
Sharafitdin Yuldashev, M. Boytemirov, A. Abdunazarov et al.· Science and innovation· 0 citations
This present study focuses on the numerical analysis of the UBC of shallow foundations subjected to different soil
layers and GWT case. A finite element-based analysis was examined by PLAXIS 2D to study the response of foundations placed
on both homogeneous and layered soil profiles. The investigation considered founda...
K. Subbalakshmi, K. Ramu· International Journal for Re...· 0 citations
Soil liquefaction typically occurs during and following earthquakes, although it may also be triggered by non-seismic dynamic loading. While liquefaction is systematically investigated using laboratory element tests, critical field-scale aspects, such as soil fabric and complex boundary conditions, remain challenging t...
Paul Pinedo, L. Monforte, Marcos Arroyo et al.· Geotechnics· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.