Method is introduced, which augments SOAP-style preconditioning with a scalar secant-energy correction adapted to Kronecker geometry and an adaptive basis update followed by variance-state downscaling, and is positioned as a scalable option for stiff, high-accuracy physics-informed training, rather than a uniform replacement for existing optimizers.
Abstract
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) often face ill-conditioned objectives that limit high-accuracy training. Dense quasi-Newton methods improve local conditioning but require expensive optimizer state, while Kronecker-factored methods such as SOAP scale to larger networks but rely on periodic basis updates. We introduce \method, which augments SOAP-style preconditioning with a scalar secant-energy correction adapted to Kronecker geometry and an adaptive basis update followed by variance-state downscaling. We characterize the directional secant matching induced by the scalar correction and give a bound on variance-state mismatch across basis changes. Across eight PDE benchmarks, \method attains the lowest final residual on six, including Burgers and Boussinesq, while SOAP-family baselines perform better on Gray-Scott and Ginzburg-Landau. On Boussinesq, \method reaches a residual of $10^{-5}$ in 4.1 hours with 9.2 GB peak VRAM, while Adam does not reach this target within 14 hours. Three-seed $L^2$ and $H^1$ errors on four representative PDEs support the link between lower residuals and improved solution accuracy. These results position \method as a scalable option for stiff, high-accuracy physics-informed training, rather than a uniform replacement for existing optimizers.
DeepOHeat-v2 is proposed, which trains on a discretized physics loss that handles the discontinuities natively, and proposes a self-improving framework: a hotspot trust gate sends flagged placements to a reference solver, and the surrogate incrementally retrains on the refined solutions, keeping an update only when it...
Xinling Yu, Yi-Xing Li, Zi-Yue Liu et al.· 0 citations
Backpropagation (BP) dominates deep learning but imposes a massive memory tax. For example, training OPT-30B with Adam requires $\approx$ 600GB of GPU memory (assuming batch size 8 and sequence length 2048). Alternatively, zero-order optimization (ZOO) trains in inference-mode (requiring only $\approx$ 60GB for the sam...
Francois Chaubard, M. Kochenderfer, Chris Ré· 0 citations
An unbiased direct gradient estimator is derived and the adaptive minimum-variance phase (AMVP) estimator is introduced for neural-network variational optimization by improving the signal-to-noise ratio of weak gradients to enable reliable scientific calculations where training previously failed, while substantially re...
Yi-He Xue, Rui Wang, Bai-Geng Wang et al.· 0 citations
Quasi-Newton (QN) methods have long been among the most effective methods for large-scale unconstrained convex optimization. Two obstacles have limited their use in deep learning: non-convexity and enormous parameter sizes. We introduce SoftServe, a family of QN methods designed to overcome these obstacles without line...
Joohwan Ko, Tetiana Parshakova, Diana Cai et al.· 0 citations
Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) frequently fail on stiff or advection-dominated PDEs, and two recent accounts offer competing remedies: switching from FP32 to FP64 to repair an L-BFGS stopping artifact, or replacing the MLP with a state-space-model (SSM) backbone plus sub-sequence alignment to counter architec...
Jin-Yuan Zhang, Peng-Ji He, He-Long Hu et al.· 0 citations