Skip to content

Creation begins with understanding: LLMs as strategy designers for privacy-preserving tabular data synthesis

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 57 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This work introduces Tabular Synthesis Strategy Designer, which uses an LLM to design synthesis procedures rather than directly generate records, and provides the LLM with tree-derived summaries of variable dependence rather than raw records, which produces Python programs for local execution and evaluation.

Abstract

Sharing tabular data in high-stakes domains is constrained by privacy regulations. Synthetic data offer a promising alternative, but deep generative models are costly to train and difficult to audit, while LLM-based methods often serialize records as text, obscuring tabular structure and exposing sensitive data. We introduce Tabular Synthesis Strategy Designer (TabSSD), which uses an LLM to design synthesis procedures rather than directly generate records. TabSSD provides the LLM with tree-derived summaries of variable dependence rather than raw records, which produces Python programs for local execution and evaluation. Across twelve datasets, TabSSD strikes a favourable balance among statistical fidelity, predictive utility, and empirical privacy risk, achieving the best average rank across six metrics among ten methods. Moreover, it substantially reduces local computation and token consumption relative to the compared methods. By enabling human-guided refinement and eliminating user-side model tuning, TabSSD lowers the expertise and infrastructure barriers to transparent tabular data synthesis.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

SSP-Bench: A Hybrid Data Generation Framework for Safety, Security, and Privacy Evaluation

SSP-Bench reveals systematic failures of static evaluation, including near-zero correlation in safety rankings due to construct mixing, strong safety--over-refusal coupling, and hidden within-family regressions, and shows that static benchmarks can misrepresent model behavior, motivating dynamic, deployment-relevant ev...

Fatih Deniz, Yazan Boshmaf, Issa M. Khalil · 0 citations
2026

PI-SAFE: Practical Privacy-Preserving LLM Inference With Adversarial Fine-Tuning for Optimized Utility

Cloud-based Large Language Model (LLM) inference services typically require users to submit plain-text inputs, thereby posing severe privacy risks. Existing privacy-preserving paradigms are mostly task-specific and often necessitate pervasive modifications to the entire server-side model. This reliance introduces subst...

Wentao Zhong, Yu-Ting Li, Di-Cong Yu et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

Auditing and Mitigating Privacy Leakage in Cloud-Edge Collaborative Decoding

CoVeil is proposed, a defense mechanism which dynamically optimizes transmitted signals to suppress leakage during decoding time while preserving the collaborative quality, and consistently improves the privacy-utility trade-off over existing baselines by reducing data leakage.

Ke-Jia Zhang, Tianyuan Zou, Zi-Xuan Gu et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Mitigating Private Data Leakage in LLMs with Whiteout

Modern large language models (LLMs) are trained on massive, largely unfiltered datasets, including content scraped from nearly every accessible website and user inputs. As a result, LLMs often memorize and reproduce personally sensitive information (PSI) such as birth dates, phone numbers, and home addresses. This lead...

Anna Yoo Jeong Ha, Ronik Bhaskar, Hai-Tao Zheng et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Learning to Refer: Client-Resolved Generation for Privacy-Aware Language Models

Client-Resolved Generation (CRG), a genera- tion interface that separates server-side generation from the lexical realization of input-derived content, is introduced, which provides a practical interface for privacy-sensitive cloud LLMs by reducing plaintext exposure across both input and output pathways while preserv-...

Jeongho Yoon, Chanhee Park, Yong-Chan Chun et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.