AutoScientist-Quant, a self evolving search process that regards quantitative research as one budgeted search problem, is presented, a self evolving search process that regards quantitative research as one budgeted search problem.
Abstract
Large language model agents can discover alphas, yet current methods have three weaknesses. The search cannot adapt during the run, automation usually ends at alpha generation while library selection and model choice stay manual, and alpha discovery can read the test window through loop feedback or code problems. We present AutoScientist-Quant, a self evolving search process that regards quantitative research as one budgeted search problem. A single controller conditions every decision on the remaining budget, choosing at each round whether to improve, combine, pivot, or stop, which node to expand, how many alphas to generate, and how to retrieve past trajectories from the shared memory. The same core then selects from the library and tunes the model, closing the loop from hypothesis to deployable strategy. We also review the evaluation pipeline reused from prior work, fix two lookahead problems, and keep the feedback window disjoint from the held out test window, so every comparison tests true generalization. On CSI universes, the framework attains the best value of nearly every metric in every setting, and these conclusions hold across several backbones and markets.
Large language models have advanced automated algorithm discovery by synthesizing executable code, but existing frameworks trap them in rigid search pipelines with pre-defined control flows. This limitation restricts adaptive reasoning, blocks cross-paradigm transfer, and discards valuable execution feedback. We propos...
Jun-Hao Qiu, Qing-Long Hu, Xia-Liang Tong et al.· 0 citations
This work introduces Open-Ended Optimization (OEO), which keeps the objective, permitted interactions, resource budget, data boundary, and evaluation fixed while allowing the optimizer to compose the improvement process online.
This work presents AI4AI\mbox{-}Bench, 10 frozen research repositories spanning 10 training algorithm families, and releases the task suite, the evaluators and every scored submission, so that the measurement can be repeated as these systems change.
Yi-Zhe Chi, Wen-Yi Li, De-Yao Hong et al.· 11 citations· ⚡3
A novel RAIE taxonomy along four scaling dimensions is proposed, which optimizes the entire thought process through search algorithms and self-verification, and introduces a task-oriented guideline for choosing the best TTS strategy.
Jia-Yu An, Zheng Chen, Yong-Cheng Jing et al.· Proceedings of the Thirty-Fi...· 0 citations
This work takes an RSI-inspired approach at the harness layer, scaling auto-research loops across increasingly numerous and diverse environments for harness rollouts, and yields reusable improvements that transfer beyond their development setting.
Hao-Zhe Liu, Tian Ye, Sen-Sen Gao et al.· 7 citations
This work compares configured Loreley QD, sequential champion editing, and independent root proposals in a matched Zstandard experiment and finds that Sequential had the highest observed 48-job mean and median and established a QD advantage.
Mo Chen· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 13, 2026
Machine-learning networks can learn without detailed instructions from a designer. Those that do may offer insight into how the brain reorganizes itself during learning.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 29, 2026
Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.