ORDDAR (Observation-Driven Reasoning for Distortion-Resilient Decision, Action, and Cognitive Recovery) is presented, a reasoning framework that models reasoning as cognitive state transitions, detects localized distortions, retrieves related reasoning from prior experiences, and repairs only the affected states.
Abstract
AI agents increasingly perform long-term reasoning, planning, tool use, memory integration, and autonomous decision making, yet erroneous intermediate states can propagate and cause inconsistent decisions and unreliable outputs. Existing reasoning approaches mainly rely on iterative planning, self-reflection, augmented memory, or verification, but rarely localize and selectively repair faulty reasoning. We present ORDDAR (Observation-Driven Reasoning for Distortion-Resilient Decision, Action, and Cognitive Recovery), a reasoning framework that models reasoning as cognitive state transitions, detects localized distortions, retrieves related reasoning from prior experiences, and repairs only the affected states. ORDDAR therefore performs recovery at the local reasoning-transition level rather than regenerating the complete trajectory. Experiments across mathematical, commonsense, multi-hop, and clinical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate improved reasoning quality, recovery ability, and interpretability over multiple evaluated reasoning baselines.
Large reasoning models (LRMs) improve performance on complex tasks through extended reasoning, yet the same process can degenerate into redundant verification and persistent generation loops. Such uncontrolled reasoning increases inference cost and creates risks of resource exhaustion and service degradation. However,...
Yuan-He Zhang, Ziwei Wang, Jie Ren et al.· 0 citations
Small reasoning models (SRMs) have shown strong performance on complex reasoning tasks by generating extended chain-of-thought trajectories, but they often fail to recover once their reasoning enters an erroneous path. Existing test-time fusion methods rely on local fusion signals to determine when to trigger fusion, w...
Myunghoon Kang, Jungseob Lee, Jaehyung Seo et al.· 0 citations
Reasoning-enabled VLA policies expose chain-of-thought (CoT) traces that appear to explain and guide their actions, creating a potential interface for runtime safety through reasoning monitoring and correction. In this work, we define and operationalize two evaluation axes for assessing when this interface can improve...
Sathwik Karnik, J. Lee, Aryaman Gupta et al.· 0 citations
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning is increasingly incorporated into Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models, yet it can degrade the performance of stronger embodied agents. We investigate this capability-dependent effect by distinguishing explicit reasoning from latent decision computation, i.e., perception-grounded computa...
Yuan-Peng Lin, Zi-Yu Zhou, Jin-Long Zhao et al.· 0 citations
MedTraj is proposed, a framework that treats reasoning trajectories as critical objects for construction, evaluation, and optimization, and quality-weighted context learning feeds trajectory evaluations back into the model at inference time, allowing it to learn from both strong and weak reasoning demonstrations.
Yun-Qi Zhu, Wen Tang, Jing-Hao Niu et al.· 0 citations
It is argued that a major challenge for next-generation agentic AI is not merely how much reasoning a language model should perform, but how it should allocate reasoning according to evolving task demands, to motivate future research on adaptive reasoning mechanisms for agentic AI.
Md. Jueal Mia, M. Amini· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 13, 2026
Machine-learning networks can learn without detailed instructions from a designer. Those that do may offer insight into how the brain reorganizes itself during learning.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 29, 2026
Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.