Skip to content

ORDDAR: Observation-Driven Reasoning for Distortion-Resilient Decision, Action, and Cognitive Recovery

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 24 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

ORDDAR (Observation-Driven Reasoning for Distortion-Resilient Decision, Action, and Cognitive Recovery) is presented, a reasoning framework that models reasoning as cognitive state transitions, detects localized distortions, retrieves related reasoning from prior experiences, and repairs only the affected states.

Abstract

AI agents increasingly perform long-term reasoning, planning, tool use, memory integration, and autonomous decision making, yet erroneous intermediate states can propagate and cause inconsistent decisions and unreliable outputs. Existing reasoning approaches mainly rely on iterative planning, self-reflection, augmented memory, or verification, but rarely localize and selectively repair faulty reasoning. We present ORDDAR (Observation-Driven Reasoning for Distortion-Resilient Decision, Action, and Cognitive Recovery), a reasoning framework that models reasoning as cognitive state transitions, detects localized distortions, retrieves related reasoning from prior experiences, and repairs only the affected states. ORDDAR therefore performs recovery at the local reasoning-transition level rather than regenerating the complete trajectory. Experiments across mathematical, commonsense, multi-hop, and clinical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate improved reasoning quality, recovery ability, and interpretability over multiple evaluated reasoning baselines.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

When Reasoning Goes Astray: Attention Dynamics of Uncontrolled Reasoning

Large reasoning models (LRMs) improve performance on complex tasks through extended reasoning, yet the same process can degenerate into redundant verification and persistent generation loops. Such uncontrolled reasoning increases inference cost and creates risks of resource exhaustion and service degradation. However,...

Yuan-He Zhang, Ziwei Wang, Jie Ren et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

ThinkFuse: Trajectory-Aware Test-Time Fusion for Small Reasoning Models

Small reasoning models (SRMs) have shown strong performance on complex reasoning tasks by generating extended chain-of-thought trajectories, but they often fail to recover once their reasoning enters an erroneous path. Existing test-time fusion methods rely on local fusion signals to determine when to trigger fusion, w...

Myunghoon Kang, Jungseob Lee, Jaehyung Seo et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

When Reasoning Helps Action: Monitoring and Steering Chain-of-Thought in Vision-Language-Action Policies

Reasoning-enabled VLA policies expose chain-of-thought (CoT) traces that appear to explain and guide their actions, creating a potential interface for runtime safety through reasoning monitoring and correction. In this work, we define and operationalize two evaluation axes for assessing when this interface can improve...

Sathwik Karnik, J. Lee, Aryaman Gupta et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Where Do Embodied Decisions Come From? Rethinking Latent and Explicit Reasoning

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning is increasingly incorporated into Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models, yet it can degrade the performance of stronger embodied agents. We investigate this capability-dependent effect by distinguishing explicit reasoning from latent decision computation, i.e., perception-grounded computa...

Yuan-Peng Lin, Zi-Yu Zhou, Jin-Long Zhao et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Constructing and Evaluating Clinical Reasoning Trajectories for Medical Agent

MedTraj is proposed, a framework that treats reasoning trajectories as critical objects for construction, evaluation, and optimization, and quality-weighted context learning feeds trajectory evaluations back into the model at inference time, allowing it to learn from both strong and weak reasoning demonstrations.

Yun-Qi Zhu, Wen Tang, Jing-Hao Niu et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Don't Overthink, Don't Underthink: Toward Adaptive Reasoning in Agentic AI

It is argued that a major challenge for next-generation agentic AI is not merely how much reasoning a language model should perform, but how it should allocate reasoning according to evolving task demands, to motivate future research on adaptive reasoning mechanisms for agentic AI.

Md. Jueal Mia, M. Amini · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 29, 2026

Who we become when we talk to machines

Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.