Information, involvement, or partnership? Exploring intrapartum decision-making during the implementation of a team-based intervention to support woman-centred care
This study aims to explore how care providers engage women and their partners in intrapartum decision-making during the implementation of the adapted Swedish version of TeamBirth, and found engagement in decision-making occurred on a continuum.
Abstract
Introduction Despite being recognised as a critical component of high-quality care, shared decision-making is still not consistently achieved during childbirth. TeamBirth is a care process developed to promote intrapartum teamwork and shared decision-making, adapted to the Swedish context and implemented in two labour wards. This study aims to explore how care providers engage women and their partners in intrapartum decision-making during the implementation of the adapted Swedish version of TeamBirth. Methods A qualitative design, based on 23 observations comprising 79 huddles, and 65 interviews with the care providers involved, was used. Data were collected April 2022 – June 2023, and analysed deductively using directed content analysis, guided by the Conceptual Framework for Patient and Family Engagement in Healthcare. Results Four levels of engagement were found. No Engagement involved care providers giving instructions without explanations. Providing Information entailed brief updates followed by instructions, with limited opportunities for questions. Involvement, the most common level, included discussions and planning with women and their partners, although final decisions were made by care providers. Partnership and Shared Leadership, the least observed level, was characterised by dialogue and joint decisions. Barriers for engagement included limited Swedish proficiency, high workload, and critical situations, whereas continuous support, effective pain management, and use of the TeamBirth care process were enabling factors. Conclusions Engagement in decision-making occurred on a continuum, with modifiable factors including workload, continuous support, and use of TeamBirth. Although conducted during the implementation of a care process designed to improve engagement, Partnership and Shared Leadership remained the least observed level.
Embedding structured, person-centred decision support for the risk assessment process fosters meaningful partnerships between older adults, care partners, and providers and suggests that targeting teams through tailored training, debriefing, and team-building activities enhances sustainability of LwR:DSA adoption.
H. Macleod, Dorothy Kessler, V. Provencher et al.· International Journal of Int...· 0 citations
Multiple long-term conditions (MLTC) are increasingly common and present challenges for hospital healthcare professionals (HCPs) making decisions about admissions, referrals, and care management in the context of a single-organ oriented health system. This qualitative study examined how HCPs in emergency and acute hosp...
S. Pretorius, S. Bellass, Rachel Cooper et al.· BMC Medicine· 0 citations
Intensive care unit (ICU) nurses are widely regarded as essential contributors to end-of-life (EOL) decision-making, given their continuous bedside presence, close engagement with patients and families, and central role in interprofessional communication. However, a persistent gap remains between the conceptual recogni...
Wenting Yin, Yi-Ting Wang, Ju Lu et al.· Journal of Visualized Experi...· 0 citations
Insight is provided into the early implementation dynamics of CoCM in a novel context, underscoring the need for clear protocols, ongoing communication, and tailored support to ensure successful integration of mental health services into primary care.
Irène Bogicevic, Milena Kostova, Pascal Clerc et al.· International Journal of Int...· 0 citations
Whether SDM occurred in PHC and the barriers, facilitators and sociodemographic factors that affect its uptake in the South African PHC setting are determined to strengthen undergraduate and postgraduate training around SDM, improve patient satisfaction and uptake of care.
Shavania Ragavan, Michéle Torlutter, D. Pretorius· African Journal of Primary H...· 0 citations
Background: Advice and Guidance (A&G) was introduced in NHS primary care to reduce waiting times for elective care and improve access to specialist input without the need for an outpatient referral. However, its impact on care pathways and equity remains unclear, especially for underserved populations.
Approach: Th...
K. Mason, Rosie Harrison, A. Faux-Nightingale et al.· International Journal of Int...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.