Skip to content
Open access

Information, involvement, or partnership? Exploring intrapartum decision-making during the implementation of a team-based intervention to support woman-centred care

Sep 2026 · PLoS ONE · Vol 21, pp. e0358750 - e0358750 · 0 citations · 44 references
Medicine

TL;DR

This study aims to explore how care providers engage women and their partners in intrapartum decision-making during the implementation of the adapted Swedish version of TeamBirth, and found engagement in decision-making occurred on a continuum.

Abstract

Introduction Despite being recognised as a critical component of high-quality care, shared decision-making is still not consistently achieved during childbirth. TeamBirth is a care process developed to promote intrapartum teamwork and shared decision-making, adapted to the Swedish context and implemented in two labour wards. This study aims to explore how care providers engage women and their partners in intrapartum decision-making during the implementation of the adapted Swedish version of TeamBirth. Methods A qualitative design, based on 23 observations comprising 79 huddles, and 65 interviews with the care providers involved, was used. Data were collected April 2022 – June 2023, and analysed deductively using directed content analysis, guided by the Conceptual Framework for Patient and Family Engagement in Healthcare. Results Four levels of engagement were found. No Engagement involved care providers giving instructions without explanations. Providing Information entailed brief updates followed by instructions, with limited opportunities for questions. Involvement, the most common level, included discussions and planning with women and their partners, although final decisions were made by care providers. Partnership and Shared Leadership, the least observed level, was characterised by dialogue and joint decisions. Barriers for engagement included limited Swedish proficiency, high workload, and critical situations, whereas continuous support, effective pain management, and use of the TeamBirth care process were enabling factors. Conclusions Engagement in decision-making occurred on a continuum, with modifiable factors including workload, continuous support, and use of TeamBirth. Although conducted during the implementation of a care process designed to improve engagement, Partnership and Shared Leadership remained the least observed level.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

Empowering Shared Decision-Making in Community-Based Care: Implementing the Living with Risk: Decision Support Approach (LwR:DSA)

Embedding structured, person-centred decision support for the risk assessment process fosters meaningful partnerships between older adults, care partners, and providers and suggests that targeting teams through tailored training, debriefing, and team-building activities enhances sustainability of LwR:DSA adoption.

H. Macleod, Dorothy Kessler, V. Provencher et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Front-line decision-making: a thematic analysis of interviews with hospital staff on referrals, admissions, and care for people with multiple long-term conditions

Multiple long-term conditions (MLTC) are increasingly common and present challenges for hospital healthcare professionals (HCPs) making decisions about admissions, referrals, and care management in the context of a single-organ oriented health system. This qualitative study examined how HCPs in emergency and acute hosp...

S. Pretorius, S. Bellass, Rachel Cooper et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Barriers and Facilitators to Intensive Care Unit Nurses' Participation in End-of-Life Decision-Making: A Scoping Review.

Intensive care unit (ICU) nurses are widely regarded as essential contributors to end-of-life (EOL) decision-making, given their continuous bedside presence, close engagement with patients and families, and central role in interprofessional communication. However, a persistent gap remains between the conceptual recogni...

Wenting Yin, Yi-Ting Wang, Ju Lu et al. · 0 citations
Case report Open access Oct 2026

Early Implementation of Collaborative Care in France: Facilitators and Barriers from the First Year of the SESAME Program

Insight is provided into the early implementation dynamics of CoCM in a novel context, underscoring the need for clear protocols, ongoing communication, and tailored support to ensure successful integration of mental health services into primary care.

Irène Bogicevic, Milena Kostova, Pascal Clerc et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

From paternalism to partnership: A patient-centred view of shared decision-making in primary health care

Whether SDM occurred in PHC and the barriers, facilitators and sociodemographic factors that affect its uptake in the South African PHC setting are determined to strengthen undergraduate and postgraduate training around SDM, improve patient satisfaction and uptake of care.

Shavania Ragavan, Michéle Torlutter, D. Pretorius · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Building an evidence base for the use of Advice and Guidance Referrals at the primary-secondary care interface: multistage mixed-methods study

Background: Advice and Guidance (A&G) was introduced in NHS primary care to reduce waiting times for elective care and improve access to specialist input without the need for an outpatient referral. However, its impact on care pathways and equity remains unclear, especially for underserved populations.   Approach: Th...

K. Mason, Rosie Harrison, A. Faux-Nightingale et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.