Skip to content
Review Open access

From paternalism to partnership: A patient-centred view of shared decision-making in primary health care

Sep 2026 · African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine · Vol 18 · 0 citations · 54 references

TL;DR

Whether SDM occurred in PHC and the barriers, facilitators and sociodemographic factors that affect its uptake in the South African PHC setting are determined to strengthen undergraduate and postgraduate training around SDM, improve patient satisfaction and uptake of care.

Abstract

Background Shared decision-making (SDM) has been advocated in the past decade for patient-centredness and autonomy. Research in primary health care (PHC) within South Africa lacks information about the uptake of SDM. Aim This study aimed to determine whether SDM occurred in PHC and the barriers, facilitators and sociodemographic factors that affect its uptake in the South African PHC setting. Setting The Alexandra Community Healthcare Centre (CHC) and Chiawelo CHC are facilities that serve the communities of Alexandra and Chiawelo, respectively. Methods The study was an analytical cross-sectional survey with a sample size of 391 participants conducted at two CHCs in the Johannesburg Metro district. A modified SDM Q-9 tool was used to determine if SDM occurred. This was followed by two more questionnaires that assessed patients’ preferred decision-making method and their perception of the barriers and facilitators of SDM. Analytical statistics, Pearson Chi2 testing and univariate and multivariate regression were used for data analysis. Results Eighty-five per cent of respondents reported that SDM did not occur during their last consultation with a healthcare worker. The two most preferred consultation models were the SDM model (37%) and the paternalistic model (36%). Participants who completed secondary education (odds ratio [OR] = 2.82, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10–7.23, p-value: 0.031) and tertiary education (OR = 6.28, 95% CI: 1.83–21.61, p-value: 0.004) were more likely to engage in SDM. Conclusion More than a third of patients wanted to be involved in SDM, but it was not routinely practised during consultations. Patients with higher levels of education reported greater SDM. Healthcare workers must be more receptive and invite open dialogue to encourage SDM. Contribution The information from this article can be used to strengthen undergraduate and postgraduate training around SDM, improve patient satisfaction and uptake of care.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Oct 2026

The role of nurses in shared decision-making in primary care: Qualitative study.

OBJECTIVE To explore the primary care nursing professionals (PCN) perception of their role in Shared Decision Making (SDM) to improve the adherence in patients with chronic pathology and a new cardiovascular and/or diabetes with new pharmacological prescription. METHODS A descriptive qualitative study was conducted w...

Carmen Gallardo-González, María Del Carmen Olmos-Palenzuela, C. Corral-Partearroyo et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Enhancing patient involvement through shared decision-making: Are we there yet in multiple myeloma? Findings from a cross-country survey

Introduction Shared decision-making (SDM) can enhance patient involvement in treatment and care decisions. Still, questions remain on how multiple myeloma (MM) patients perceive and evaluate their current and desired roles in these decisions and whether characteristics influence their willingness to be involved. This s...

Charlotte Verbeke, Jolien Broekmans, Elise Schoefs et al. · 1 citation
Open access Sep 2026

Information, involvement, or partnership? Exploring intrapartum decision-making during the implementation of a team-based intervention to support woman-centred care

This study aims to explore how care providers engage women and their partners in intrapartum decision-making during the implementation of the adapted Swedish version of TeamBirth, and found engagement in decision-making occurred on a continuum.

Karin Johnson, M. Nyström, A. Ivert et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Barriers and facilitators for conducting and implementing health technology assessment in Jordan: researchers and decision-makers’ perspectives

Abstract Objectives Health technology assessment (HTA) is a multidisciplinary approach that evaluates the clinical data and cost-effectiveness of health technologies within broader policy and societal contexts. This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to conducting HTA and implementing its findings in Jor...

R. Mousa, Samar J. Melhem, S. Alaujan et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Interprofessional Insights into Shared Decision-Making in Inpatient Mental Health Facilities for Youth in Austria—A Cross-Sectional Study

Introduction: Shared Decision-Making (SDM) is increasingly recommended in child and adolescent psychiatry (CAP), yet little is known about its implementation across professional groups in Austrian inpatient CAP services. This study examined differences in SDM knowledge and implementation between professions and explore...

Miriam Subhieh, Valentina Mitgutsch, Harald Stummer · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Empowering Shared Decision-Making in Community-Based Care: Implementing the Living with Risk: Decision Support Approach (LwR:DSA)

Embedding structured, person-centred decision support for the risk assessment process fosters meaningful partnerships between older adults, care partners, and providers and suggests that targeting teams through tailored training, debriefing, and team-building activities enhances sustainability of LwR:DSA adoption.

H. Macleod, Dorothy Kessler, V. Provencher et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.