Jan 2026· 6 citations· ⚡ 1 influential· 33 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
It is suggested that CoT prompting activates specific latent features to trigger reasoning, and that targeted intervention on these features offers an alternative pathway to elicit efficient reasoning behavior without explicit CoT prompting.
Abstract
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting often improves the reasoning performance of large language models (LLMs), but the internal signal that triggers this behavior remains poorly understood. Leveraging the sparse features captured by Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs), we propose a systematic framework to analyze and intervene on the internal representations of LLMs, identifying a small set of latent features that are linked to reasoning behavior and can be causally tested through targeted intervention. Across multiple model families and reasoning benchmarks, we show that steering one or a small number of reasoning-related latent features can substantially induce reasoning behavior without explicit CoT prompting, achieving accuracy comparable to CoT. We further show that the identified features are not tied to particular wording patterns or verbosity, and confirm their causal role in reasoning through suppression experiments that impair performance even under CoT prompting. These results suggest that CoT prompting activates specific latent features to trigger reasoning, and that targeted intervention on these features offers an alternative pathway to elicit efficient reasoning behavior without explicit CoT prompting. Code is available at https://github.com/Zhenghao-He/LatentCoT.
This work introduces a sequential activation patching framework that traces CoT-conditioned attention-head activations across token positions and aggregates their effects using Part-of-Speech-guided analysis, and introduces Sequential Multi-Head Patching to evaluate the joint contribution of distributed head sets, toge...
M. Dura, Serkan Öztürk, Selma Tekir· 1 citation· ⚡1
Activation steering has become a widely used approach for controlling language models during explicit chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning, motivating its extension to latent CoT. However, we find that steering continuous thoughts produces substantially weaker effects on subsequent language generation than steering explici...
JELAR, a Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture (JEPA)-based latent reasoning framework that conditions latent reasoning supervision on acoustic representations learned from raw waveforms, demonstrates the effectiveness of JEPA-conditioned latent reasoning as an alternative to explicit textual CoT supervision.
Donghang Wu, Haoyang Zhang, Yizhou Peng et al.· 0 citations
This work applies Top-K Sparse Autoencoders to the intermediate representations of DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B and examines the model's divergent behaviors across math-solving tasks of three distinct difficulty levels, identifying a clear distinction in how the model functions under two reasoning modes.
Bo Cheng, Qiaolin Lu, Yi Chang et al.· 0 citations
These findings show stronger, less prompt-conditional CoT-like behavior in the reasoning-tuned model, consistent with but not proof of latent reasoning, thus investigates latent reasoning without relying on models'self-reported traces.
Armaanjit Singh, R. Le, Jasminepreet Kaur et al.· 0 citations
Chain-of-thought (CoT) can sound plausible yet be unfaithful to the model's underlying reasoning. Most prior work probes CoT faithfulness through input--output behavior or input attributions, leaving internal computation largely underexplored. We instead cast faithfulness as internal concept grounding: Does a large lan...
Qianli Wang, Yilong Wang, Dennis Wei et al.· 0 citations