Comprehensive in-domain and out-of-domain evaluations across multiple LLMs demonstrate that SFS-DPO and SFS-DPO-R consistently outperform prior step-level training baselines and reveal improvements in self-correction frequency and effectiveness.
Abstract
Achieving effective self-correction, where models verify and correct their own mistakes, remains a fundamental challenge for large language models (LLMs). In this work, we propose Self-Fix Step-DPO (SFS-DPO), a reinforcement learning based, two-stage framework for step-level self-verification and self-correction. The first stage strengthens step-level reasoning via step-level preference optimization, while the second stage explicitly trains models to self-verify and self-correct. We further introduce a teacher-assisted variant, SFS-DPO-R, which incorporates explanatory rationales for error verification to provide stronger corrective signals. Comprehensive in-domain and out-of-domain evaluations across multiple LLMs demonstrate that SFS-DPO and SFS-DPO-R consistently outperform prior step-level training baselines. Our analysis further reveals improvements in self-correction frequency and effectiveness, highlighting the importance of strengthening step-level reasoning for robust performance.
To improve self-modeling skill, a scalable synthetic-data pipeline is developed that produces self-modeling training data, and reinforcement-learning can improve aggregate self-modeling skill across three open-source model families with some transfer to held-out tasks.
Si-Qi Zeng, Andre N. Assis, Rowan Wang· 0 citations
SOLID is proposed, a novel framework for self-improving OR language models without verified answers or external evaluators that improves solution accuracy for both general-purpose and OR-tuned models over outcome-only group-relative training.
Rui-Chen Zhu, Ming-Long Cao, Chen-Yu Zhou et al.· 0 citations
Step-level reasoning evaluators are commonly based on autoregressive language models, whose causal attention restricts each step representation to the problem, previous steps, and the current step. Yet, when the complete solution is available, the validity of an earlier step may become clearer only through its downstre...
Yi-Ming Feng, Nai-Hao Deng, Yu-Long Chen et al.· 0 citations
TIPS (Thinking-Induced Process Supervision), an outcome-only reinforcement learning (RL) framework for training generative PRMs, is introduced and validated, demonstrating the effectiveness of TIPS across math and agent benchmarks and four backbone families.
Sheng-Da Fan, Xin Cong, Zhong Zhang et al.· 0 citations
This study studies how LLMs learn from iterative experience at test time, a setting the authors refer to as Chain-of-Experience (CoE), where models accumulate experiential traces through iterative interactions with self or environmental feedback to form a continual improvement loop beyond zero-shot inference.
Hao-Qin Tu, Yun-Hao Fang, Yizhong Wang et al.· 0 citations
Negative Self-Distillation (NSD) is introduced, a new framework that optimizes LLMs by diverging from flawed reasoning rather than imitating privileged solutions, and consistently outperforms OPSD and other label-free, self-bootstrapping reinforcement learning (RL) baselines.
Rong-Can Pei, Zhepei Wei, Shu-Yao Xu et al.· 1 citation