Jun 2026· arXiv.org· Vol abs/2606.27499· 0 citations· 50 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
Inspired by dual-coding theory, this work proposes a memory architecture that uses parallel visual and verbal codes, which it calls DualMem, and views this as a step towards memory systems that preserve a richer record of agents'observations.
Abstract
Agent benchmarks for measuring memory largely study textual cases, in which information is deliberately extracted from the environment, written down, and then later retrieved. In other words, they assess what agents elected to record, not what they happened to see. We introduce DMV-Bench (code: https://github.com/yyyujintang/DMV-Bench), the first interactive benchmark for visual memory in multimodal agents, to study this often-neglected property. DMV-Bench is built on (1) a controlled home-furnishing e-commerce environment, supported by a catalog of 1,000 product variants, and (2) a text-leakage contract which ensures that the primary discriminative signal of each task is solely in the pixels. In DMV-Bench, agents undergo chains of autonomous shopping sessions in which every visited product image carries a unique, pre-rendered incidental cue that the agent is later asked to recall. We show that conventional solutions struggle with this task. Inspired by dual-coding theory, we propose a memory architecture that uses parallel visual and verbal codes, which we call DualMem. On DMV-Bench, DualMem outperforms a caption-only baseline and three recent multimodal agent-memory systems across multi-session chain lengths on multiple models. These gains persist even adjusting for memory-bank size and encoding-position bias. Further experiments also reveal an asymmetric division of labor between the two codes; a weighted coding scheme is often strongest. We view this as a step towards memory systems that preserve a richer record of agents'observations.
STRAND is introduced, a benchmark of human-verified object-centric facts that evaluates intermediate reasoning by decomposing queries into sub-questions, distinguishing genuine temporal understanding from coincidental correctness and an object-centric framework that explicitly constructs and reasons over structured obj...
T. Nguyen, C. Trinh, Khoi M. Le et al.· 0 citations
Savor is introduced, a training framework that augments the output schema with token and answer confidence, optimises the policy with a Group Relative Policy Optimisation objective that penalises calibration error and poor abstention decisions, and uses the learned confidence at inference time to revisit visual evidenc...
Zian Ding, Zi-Lin Zhao, Ying-Jie He et al.· 0 citations
This work introduces CVPD (Contrastive Counterfactual Visual Process Distillation), which is the first fully self-contained framework for dense, on-policy, token-level visual self-distillation for MLLMs, and proposes a three-gate Counterfactual Criterion that identifies visual blind spots where zooming into a region ch...
Shravan Venkatraman, Omkar Thawakar, Ritesh Thawkar et al.· 2 citations
Many vision applications ask several independent, forced-choice questions about the same image. Visual Jev encodes the image and public context once, executes isolated question suffixes as a batch, and reads candidate probabilities from the backbone's language-model head. Across four benchmarks, answer-supervised post-...
This work proposes InSight-doc, an agentic visual perception framework that treats visual resolution as an adaptive reasoning-time resource that starts from low resolution and selectively zooms into high-resolution regions for finer evidence, without relying on any external retriever.
Kaican Li, Wei-Yan Xie, Lewei Yao et al.· 0 citations
The contrastive evidence gap is formalized, the per-token log-likelihood ratio that a model assigns to its own output when conditioned on a question-relevant region versus an irrelevant one, and it is shown that the gap is complementary to the model's own confidence.
Santiram Tiwari, N. Naik, Devbrat Pandey et al.· 0 citations