Skip to content
Review Open access

Proper Utilization of Generative AI in Scholarly Writing: The Researcher and Author Perspective

Jul 2026 · Journal of Korean medical science · Vol 41 · 2 citations · 9 references
Medicine

TL;DR

It is essential to implement standardized frameworks that require explicit disclosure of AI use to ensure transparency and uphold trust in scholarly communication.

Abstract

The use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in scholarly publishing is expanding rapidly, yet clear standards for its appropriate use and disclosure remain lacking. Surveys indicate that many researchers already use AI tools for manuscript preparation, particularly for writing assistance and error detection. However, attitudes toward acceptable AI use and disclosure requirements remain inconsistent, especially regarding the use of AI in drafting manuscripts and in the peer-review process. Analyses of manuscript submissions to major journal groups suggest that the proportion of authors disclosing AI use is substantially lower than estimates from researcher surveys, indicating possible underreporting or uncertainty about reporting requirements. It is therefore essential to implement standardized frameworks that require explicit disclosure of AI use to ensure transparency and uphold trust in scholarly communication.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Oct 2026

AI-assisted peer review: efficiency for reviewers, burden for authors—a narrative review

Artificial intelligence (AI) in scholarly peer review has the potential to simplify the work of editors and reviewers through faster triage, automated reporting completeness checks, and scalable synthesis of reviewer comments. However, it also presents practical, ethical, and technical limitations that may place implem...

A. Babker · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

A Review of the TITAN Guideline: Advancing Transparency and Responsible Artificial Intelligence Use in Medical Research and Scholarly Publishing

The TITAN guidelines are reviewed as a practical framework for improving transparency and responsible reporting of AI use in medical research and scholarly publishing and can accommodate emerging AI technologies, including multimodal and agentic systems.

Arzoo Nazir, Shah Zeb · 0 citations
Review Oct 2026

Generative AI in Publishing: An Editors'Panel on Ethics and Policies

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is reshaping scholarly research faster than journals have developed stable norms for its use. This article presents an edited thematic account of a 2026 Joint Statistical Meetings panel that brought together editorial perspectives from mathematical statistics, data science, bi...

Jun Yan, Mark E. Glickman, Paul S. Albert et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

When AI use becomes the norm: Researcher perspectives on AI disclosure policy and practice.

The study provides empirical evidence supporting the development of a structured AI contribution taxonomy as a more principled and practical alternative to existing disclosure practices and suggests that effective AI disclosure governance should incorporate field-sensitive adaptation rather than relying on uniform impl...

Ayoung Yoon, Siena Oristaglio · 0 citations
#generative ai Review Open access Sep 2026

From Adoption to Accountability in Generative AI Use: A Risk-Based Framework

An Integrated Risk-Based Framework for Responsible Generative AI Writing (IRF–GenAIW) is proposed that guides disclosure, verification, human oversight, authorship, confidentiality and accountability in Gen-AI use across various academic, professional and industrial sectors.

Richard Mulenga, M. Muhyila · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.