Benchmarking Regularization Methods For 3D Radio Tomographic Imaging
TL;DR
Evaluating three distinct regularization approaches within the x3DPRA framework shows that Total Variation regularization provides the best reconstruction quality but not the fastest runtime, providing guidance for developing high-resolution 3D RTI systems for future ISAC applications.
Abstract
Integrated Sensing and Communication (ISAC) is an important technology for 6G, enabling wireless systems to perceive their physical environment. Radio Tomographic Imaging (RTI) is a potential technique for device-free sensing in ISAC, reconstructing object locations and shapes from Received Signal Strength (RSS) measurements. It can complement other techniques, such as radar and LiDAR, by providing a narrowband modality with wavelength resolution. Recently, an extended version of RTI, known as the extended phaseless Rytov approximation (x3DPRA), has been developed to enhance RTI reconstruction quality, estimate material parameters, and extend RTI from two to three dimensions (3D). However, the 3D formulation is even more ill-posed than the 2D form, as the number of measurements is far fewer than the number of unknown voxels. In this work, we systematically evaluate and compare three distinct regularization approaches (Ridge, Total Variation, and Tensor Nuclear) within the x3DPRA framework. We provide a detailed performance analysis by evaluating both reconstruction quality and computational runtime across the three methods. Our findings show that Total Variation regularization provides the best reconstruction quality but not the fastest runtime, providing guidance for developing high-resolution 3D RTI systems for future ISAC applications.