Aug 2026· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining V.2· pp. 390-401· 0 citations· 28 references
Abstract
Counterfactual analysis aims to identify minimal and semantically meaningful changes that alter a model's prediction. Existing perturbation approaches generate counterfactuals by directly editing nodes, edges, or attributes, often producing explanations that are model-dependent and detached from the underlying data distribution. In this paper, we introduce Counterfactual Subgraph Retrieval (CF-SGR), a dataset-grounded formulation that retrieves from a large graph subgraphs that are structurally and semantically similar to a query but induce different predictions under the same model, yielding domain-valid and verifiable counterfactual explanations. To solve CF-SGR, we propose Concept-guided Counterfactual Subgraph Retrieval (CCSGR), which operates in a shared multi-scale graph concept space aligned with a trained GNN and replaces fine-grained node-level edits with concept-level reasoning. CCSGR performs retrieval via concept-based filtering, robustness-aware ranking, and diversity-aware selection, enabling scalable and non-redundant search over large graphs. We provide theoretical guarantees on correctness, robustness, and efficiency and demonstrate that CCSGR improves retrieval quality by up to 40% while achieving speedups of 20× on large-scale graphs across six real-world datasets spanning five domains.
GraphMind, a model that jointly processes micro- and macro-level structures for novelty prediction and rationale generation, is proposed that significantly outperforms baseline LLMs in both novelty score prediction and rationale generation.
Italo Luis da Silva, Hanqi Yan, Lin Gui et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 1 citation
Counterfactual explanations for graph-structured data seek to determine minimal and realistic modifications required in an input graph to alter a model's prediction to a predefined output. Although counterfactual explainers that support modifying the graph by both adding and removing edges have recently emerged, there...
Maria Myrto Villia, Filippos Gouidis, T. Patkos et al.· 0 citations
Temporal graph counterfactual explanations typically change past events to change or invalidate an original prediction, while leaving its replacement unspecified. Yet a user facing a predicted outcome often asks which past conditions would make a particular alternative occur instead. We formulate this destination-speci...
This work proposes Graph Diffusion Counterfactual Explanation via Inversion (GDCE-I), a discrete denoising diffusion model with a novel discrete inversion scheme that enables distribution-aware edits leveraging the whole domain edit space and qualitatively shows that GDCE-I attains interpretable in-distribution solutio...
Scientific papers may relate by problem, method, result, or contribution, but document-level retrievers collapse these into a single similarity score without saying why they are related. Citation- and similarity-based retrieval alone also confines search to the neighbourhood of what is already known, whereas generative...
Italo Luis da Silva, Hanqi Yan, Yujing Wang et al.· 0 citations
This paper develops a comprehensive benchmark construction framework and constructs three diverse benchmark datasets and proposes a unified evaluation framework that assesses both linguistic quality and factual consistency, providing a comprehensive approach to evaluating generated summaries for content fidelity and ac...
Xiaoxuan Gou, Weiguo Zheng, Han-Qing Guo et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.