BharatSetu is released as a machine layer and a human-correction layer keyed to the same row identifiers, so that each corrected column upgrades every pair that uses it, together with an evaluation protocol.
Abstract
India's Eighth Schedule recognises 22 languages, yet parallel data is uneven across them, and many language pairs, especially among lower-resource languages such as Bodo, Dogri, Santali and Kashmiri, lack direct bitext. We present BharatSetu 22-Indic 1M, a row-aligned table of 984,764 English sentences, each paired with machine translations into all 22 scheduled languages (21,664,808 Indic cells), generated with the sarvamai/sarvam-translate model family. Because every Indic cell in a row translates the same English sentence, any two columns form a translation pair: 462 directed Indic-to-Indic pairs, or 506 including English, without direct bitext. We call these pivot-derived pairs and propose a confidence layer that lets users choose how strictly each pair is connected. The corpus is machine-generated and not human-verified; quality is expected to vary by language, domain and sentence style, and pivot-derived pairs can inherit errors from both sides. We therefore release BharatSetu as a machine layer and propose a human-correction layer keyed to the same row identifiers, so that each corrected column upgrades every pair that uses it, together with an evaluation protocol. We report no translation-quality results.
In this paper, we present ANVITA machine translation system submitted to WMT 2026 shared task on Low-Resource Indic Language Translation, where the team participated for six translation directions: { Khasi, Nagamese, and Tagin } ↔ English. Two core ideas shaped the design of ANVITA system. Firstly, transfer learning by...
S. J, Daneshwari Kankanwadi, Abhinav Gugulothu et al.· Proceedings of the Eleventh...· 0 citations
Effective tokenization is a foundational component of Large Language Model (LLM) development, yet it remains an open challenge for morphologically rich, lowresource languages such as Kapampangan. This paper presents a systematic evaluation of Byte-Pair Encoding (BPE) and the Unigram Language Model for Kapampangan, an u...
Harwin C. Mendoza, Edward Allen B. Manaloto, Aaron John V. Castañeda et al.· 2026 IEEE International Conf...· 0 citations
This study presents the first English Mizo parallel dataset of Indian court judgments, and finds that English words are borrowed in a very selective way: official and legal terms are almost always kept in English, but words for everyday things like actions, situations, and results are usually expressed in native Mizo.
Idioms have long been a challenge for machine translation, and while large language models (LLMs) have proven increasingly adept at handling them, whether quality estimation (QE) systems have kept pace and can reliably score idiomatic renderings of these expressions above faulty literal ones remains unclear. We introdu...
Malik Marmonier, Benoît Sagot, Rachel Bawden· 0 citations
COILD, an Indic-centric parallel corpus comprising over 1.16 million human-translated and human-verified sentence pairs, covers 20 Indian language pairs across the Indo-Aryan, Dravidian, Tibeto-Burman, and Austro-Asiatic language families, and provides a valuable training and evaluation resource for advancing multiling...
Kshetrimayum Boynao Singh, Nitin Kumar Mishra, P. Dutta et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
Results suggest that Indic-specialized adaptive segmentation can reduce tokenization disparity while maintaining competitive downstream performance, and suggest that Indic-specialized adaptive segmentation can reduce tokenization disparity while maintaining competitive downstream performance.