ProtoArena is introduced, a black-box, multi-component, dynamic benchmark with 80 cross-component vulnerability-exploitation environments spanning 11 protocol and application domains and 7 attack categories and success with limited black-box information remains low and varies across domains and attack categories.
Abstract
Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly used for vulnerability analysis, yet existing benchmarks provide limited coverage of exploitation that depends on interactions among network protocol components. Such vulnerabilities arise from inconsistencies in message interpretation, timing, state, or trust assumptions across participants. We introduce ProtoArena, a black-box, multi-component, dynamic benchmark with 80 cross-component vulnerability-exploitation environments spanning 11 protocol and application domains and 7 attack categories. Tasks are primarily informed by published protocol-attack mechanisms. Agents interact with running systems through scoped interfaces to achieve security-effect objectives without target source code. Three information levels assess guided reproduction, exploitation with mechanism and topology context, and effect-directed black-box exploration. A hybrid verifier combines rule-based checks with LLM review of independently collected traffic and logs. We evaluate five LLMs. Claude Opus 4.8 achieves the highest observed success rates: 48.8% under L1 guidance and 12.5% under effect-directed black-box L3. In a separate DNSBomb optimization experiment, it achieves a peak downstream-response to average query-input byte-rate ratio exceeding 171,000 times. The results show that agents can achieve verifiable exploitation effects in some cross-component environments, but success with limited black-box information remains low and varies across domains and attack categories. All experiments use controlled, explicitly authorized targets; they do not test production systems or disclose previously unknown vulnerabilities.
This work presents AgentXploit, a two-role auditing system that separates repository-level attack-path discovery from runtime exploitation and introduces AgentXploit-Bench, containing 72 reproducible vulnerabilities across 12 open-source AI-agent systems and frameworks.
Wei-Da Liang, Shi Qiu, Zhun Wang et al.· 0 citations
Modern Computer Use Agents (CUAs) directly interact with graphical user interfaces and execute third-party web tools, exposing them to indirect prompt injection across every rendered page and tool response. While the Dual-LLM pattern is the primary system-level architecture offering formal security guarantees - using a...
Giulio Zingrillo, Hanna Foerster, Ilia Shumailov et al.· 0 citations
A framework for evaluating vulnerability reports via probes, executable checks of security properties, which surfaced 23 previously unreported vulnerabilities, the majority of which have been confirmed by maintainers.
Andy K. Zhang, A. Huang, Joey Ji et al.· 0 citations
This work constructs a concrete prompt-injection attack that succeeds despite all constituent agents individually operating CaMeL, and introduces multi-CaMeL, an agent-to-agent communication protocol that preserves provenance across agent boundaries by separating trusted natural-language instructions from untrusted dat...
James Peters-Gill, Avi Semler, Henning Bartsch et al.· 0 citations
The results show that MetaPermit produces 31% more consistent authorization decisions than LLM-driven authorization and outperforms the state-of-the-art defenses CaMeL and IPIGuard in both task completion and robustness to IPI attacks, with no malicious tool calls executed.
Han-Zhang Ma, Alicia Y. Hariri, Tian-Xiang Shen et al.· 0 citations
This work forms attack and defense as partially observed state control in SEAD, deriving their design requirements from this shared execution process and constructs an environment-verifiable dataset integrating controlled initial states, replayable tool environments, and task-specific executable checks.
Xin-Jie Shen, Jun-Ran Wang, Rong-Zhe Wei et al.· 0 citations