Skip to content

Multi-Token Random-Walk Learning via Meeting-Triggered Information Exchange

Oct 2026 · 0 citations · 19 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This work investigates multi-token RW learning under two information exchange policies, which average stochastic gradients and updated models, respectively, when tokens meet, and establishes iteration complexity lower bounds for non-convex, convex, and strongly convex objectives on complete graphs.

Abstract

Random walk (RW)-based algorithms are widely used in decentralized learning due to their low communication overhead and scalability. While most existing methods rely on a single token, multiple tokens can explore the network in parallel and exchange information upon meeting. However, the fundamental benefits of such meeting-triggered interactions remain unclear. In this work, we investigate multi-token RW learning under two information exchange policies: \textsc{Average-Gradient} and \textsc{Average-Model}, which average stochastic gradients and updated models, respectively, when tokens meet. We establish iteration complexity lower bounds for non-convex, convex, and strongly convex objectives on complete graphs, which apply to both exchange policies. Compared with single-token RW learning, the scaling factor in these bounds is reduced by a factor of $m^2$ for non-convex and convex objectives, and by an exponentially in $m$ for strongly convex objectives, where $m$ denotes the number of tokens. Numerical experiments reveal distinct behaviors of the two policies under two performance criteria: mean-token loss (the average loss across all tokens) and best-token loss (the minimum loss across all tokens). \textsc{Average-Model} achieves lower mean-token loss and is relatively insensitive to the network-to-token ratio $N/m$, where $N$ is the number of nodes. In contrast, \textsc{Average-Gradient} achieves lower best-token loss but exhibits a trade-off between parallel exploration and gradient interference as $N/m$ decreases.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

RW-LoRA: Communication-Efficient Decentralized LoRA Fine-Tuning via Random Walks

A random-walk-based LoRA fine-tuning scheme that eliminates the need for global synchronization, substantially reduces communication and computation costs, and avoids aggregation errors is proposed and provides rigorous convergence guarantees for non-convex objectives under standard assumptions.

Xing-Ran Chen, Rohit Bhagat, Ghadir Ayache et al. · 1 citation
Preprint Oct 2026

Scalar Communication via Random Direction Refreshing for Distributed Optimization

Distributed optimization over networks requires agents to repeatedly exchange decision variables with their neighbors. When the decision dimension $d$ is large, these exchanges dominate the communication cost, which is critical for bandwidth-constrained agents. Existing remedies quantize or sparsify the exchanged vecto...

M. Rostami, S. Kia · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Repeated averaging on expanders I: random $d$-regular graph

Repeated averaging on graphs is a natural prototype of local stochastic exchange, modeling consensus formation, information spreading, and wealth redistribution. Its convergence has attracted longstanding interest, from Bourgain's complete-graph $L^1$ cutoff question in the 80s (answered in recent years by Chatterjee,...

Dong Yao, Ling-Fu Zhang · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Codebook Agent: Amortized Topology Design for LLM Multi-Agent Systems

Codebook Agent is the most accurate method on all six benchmarks the authors compare, and an MLP proxy that reads the flattened adjacency, regressed on measured utility and per-task normalized token cost, reranks the top decoded candidates in a single batched forward pass.

Jin-Xi Yu, Yu-Bei Li, E. Jiang et al. · 1 citation
Preprint Oct 2026

From Mixing to Tearing: Graph Decomposition in Decentralized Optimization via Message Passing

A graph decomposition framework is introduced that uses the network to design the method, not merely execute it, and it jointly determines how agreement is imposed, which variables are optimized jointly (blocks), and which connected subgraphs host the agents solving each block.

Kuang-Yu Ding, Gesualdo Scutari · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Budget-Independent Influence Maximization in Nearly Linear Time

This work reserves $O(\varepsilon k)$ seed positions for cost-weighted random vertices, allowing reverse-reachable searches to stop as soon as they encounter a reserved seed.

Zhi-Jie Zhang · 1 citation

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.