Aug 2026· Frontiers in Oncology· Vol 16· 0 citations· 149 references
Medicine
TL;DR
The conceptual boundaries and operational criteria for identifying OnF in CRC are discussed, its regulatory mechanisms, plasticity-associated phenotypes, and translational relevance are examined, and the importance of distinguishing direct evidence of OnF from evidence of related plasticity mechanisms is emphasized.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) progression and metastasis, as well as tolerance to therapy, are driven not only by genetic alterations but also by cell-state plasticity. Oncofetal reprogramming (OnF) refers to the reactivation of fetal intestinal developmental or injury-repair programs in tumor cells, thereby weakening adult lineage identity and enhancing the capacity for state transitions. Available evidence suggests that, in specific Wnt-dependent or APC-aberrant contexts, YAP/TAZ–TEAD and AP-1 may act cooperatively to establish and maintain the OnF state, whereas Wnt, EGFR–MAPK, FGF/FGFR, TGF-β, and extracellular matrix signaling contribute to its establishment and maintenance in a context-dependent manner. The OnF state can also intersect with epithelial–mesenchymal plasticity, dynamic stemness, drug-tolerant persister states, and immune and stromal niches, collectively increasing cellular heterogeneity, adaptability to therapy, and relapse potential in CRC. This review discusses the conceptual boundaries and operational criteria for identifying OnF in CRC, examines its regulatory mechanisms, plasticity-associated phenotypes, and translational relevance, and emphasizes the importance of distinguishing direct evidence of OnF from evidence of related plasticity mechanisms. Further elucidation of the OnF state may facilitate biomarker development and anti-plasticity therapies, although its clinical translation will require standardized state classification and clinical validation.
Current evidence linking stemness plasticity to spatial niche regulation and treatment failure in HCC is synthesized, and a therapeutic framework that integrates targeting of intracellular regulatory programs with disruption of microenvironmental support systems is outlined.
H. Ahn, Sujin Kim, H. Cho· Journal of Liver Cancer· 0 citations
It is argued that metastatic competence, therapy resistance, and immune evasion can be viewed as functional outputs of remembered plasticity rather than solely as consequences of a contemporaneous mesenchymal phenotype, positioning memory-bearing states as an important target for future therapeutic strategies.
Dominika Denisz, Magdalena Fabian, Jan Olszewski et al.· Cellular Oncology· 0 citations
Tumor plasticity and microenvironmental heterogeneity are established as an integrated, evolving system that fuels metastasis and limits durable treatment responses.
G. Dagar, M. Dagar, Ashna Gupta et al.· MedComm· 0 citations
This review advances a new evidence-weighted model in which curcumin may suppress CSC persistence not through a single molecular target, but by destabilizing the multilayer epigenetic circuitry that enables plasticity.
J. N. Rana, Jayashri Ghosh, Shoail Mumtaz· International Journal of Mol...· 0 citations
This review evaluating how the antagonistic interplay between Polycomb and Trithorax complexes, chromatin modifier activity, and enhancer reprogramming affects lineage identity and enables multi-lineage plasticity in cancer underscores epigenetic deregulation as a primary driver of lineage plasticity and intratumoral h...
Ezgi Boyvatlı, Burcu Akman, E. Bağırsakçı et al.· FEBS Letters· 0 citations
Various epigenetic mechanisms controlling cancer cell‐intrinsic states, cancer cell–TME crosstalk, current epigenetic therapies, and future research directions that may lead to the discovery of new biomarkers and the development of effective epigenetic anticancer therapeutics are discussed.
Ji Hoon Park, Mi-Young Kim· Molecular Oncology· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.