Skip to content
Review Open access

Curcumin and Cancer Stem Cells: Epigenetic Mechanisms Underlying Therapeutic Resistance and Tumor Relapse

Aug 2026 · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · Vol 27, pp. 6945 · 0 citations · 94 references
Medicine

TL;DR

This review advances a new evidence-weighted model in which curcumin may suppress CSC persistence not through a single molecular target, but by destabilizing the multilayer epigenetic circuitry that enables plasticity.

Abstract

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) drive therapeutic resistance, metastasis, and tumor recurrence through reversible transitions among stem-like, differentiated, epithelial, and mesenchymal states, which are sustained by interconnected epigenetic mechanisms. To our knowledge, this is the first review to integrate curcumin-mediated regulation of DNA methylation, chromatin remodeling, and non-coding RNAs within a single CSC plasticity framework and to propose the concept of an “epigenetic collapse of CSC plasticity” as a mechanistic explanation for how curcumin may weaken stemness, state switching, and adaptive treatment resistance. Evidence was critically evaluated through structured searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, Google Scholar, and citation tracking, while direct curcumin–epigenetic evidence was distinguished from independent CSC evidence and inferential mechanistic links. Curcumin has been reported to modulate DNMT1 and locus-specific DNA methylation; regulate HDACs, p300/CBP, EZH2, H3K27me3, and BMI1; and alter selected microRNA, long non-coding RNA, and circular RNA pathways, with comparatively stronger evidence involving the miR-34 family, miR-200c, miR-21, H19, and circHN1. However, current evidence is constrained by the predominance of bulk cancer-cell models, heterogeneous formulations and exposure conditions, and the scarcity of epigenetic rescue experiments combined with rigorous functional CSC assays. By unifying previously fragmented epigenetic evidence, this review advances a new evidence-weighted model in which curcumin may suppress CSC persistence not through a single molecular target, but by destabilizing the multilayer epigenetic circuitry that enables plasticity. Curcumin should therefore be regarded as a context-dependent, multilayer epigenetic modulator rather than an established CSC-eradicating therapy, and its translational relevance requires validation in prospectively defined CSC models with pharmacologically justified delivery and exposure conditions.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

Stemness plasticity in hepatocellular carcinoma: spatial niches and therapeutic implications

Current evidence linking stemness plasticity to spatial niche regulation and treatment failure in HCC is synthesized, and a therapeutic framework that integrates targeting of intracellular regulatory programs with disruption of microenvironmental support systems is outlined.

H. Ahn, Sujin Kim, H. Cho · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Epigenetic Plasticity in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Mechanisms of Therapy Resistance, Biomarkers, and Therapeutic Vulnerabilities

Overall, epigenetic plasticity represents both a major driver of TNBC resistance and a therapeutically exploitable vulnerability, provided those future strategies account for tumor heterogeneity, adaptive cell-state transitions, biomarker-guided patient selection, and combination-based treatment design.

A. Alaa, Salma A. B. El-Din, Mohannad A. Farrag et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Hypoxia and Epigenetic Reprogramming in Cancer: A Narrative Review of Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications

Hypoxia stabilizes HIF-1a and HIF-2α, which cooperate with multiple epigenetic regulators, including DNA methyltransferases, histone-modifying enzymes, chromatin remodelling complexes, and non–coding RNAs, which promote EMT, CSC maintenance, immune escape, metastasis, and resistance to chemotherapy and immunotherapy.

Yasamin Al-Qassab, Tharwa H. Al-Tai, Suha A. al-Fakhar et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Oncofetal reprogramming and cellular plasticity in colorectal cancer: from mechanisms to clinical translation

The conceptual boundaries and operational criteria for identifying OnF in CRC are discussed, its regulatory mechanisms, plasticity-associated phenotypes, and translational relevance are examined, and the importance of distinguishing direct evidence of OnF from evidence of related plasticity mechanisms is emphasized.

Hao-Yu Wang, Song-Hao Liu, Ming-Xuan Zhang et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Epigenetic control of cellular plasticity in breast cancer progression.

Breast cancer remains a leading cause of death among women, with the majority of mortality being attributed to metastatic disease and acquisition of therapeutic resistance. Epigenetic-driven plasticity in breast cancer cells is a critical mediator of breast cancer progression and remains a leading challenge for effecti...

Ellie J. Massey, Elizabeth Podleszanski, William J. Muller · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.