An unsupervised psychometric pipeline is introduced that recovers four interpretable behavioural factors from model rollouts that can be considered in terms of learning, scaling, and composing traits in weight space, providing a bridge between personality measurement, model editing, and safety.
Abstract
Large language models exhibit recurring behavioural patterns -- personas -- that shape generalisation and safety, but we lack reliable tools for decomposing, measuring, and controlling them. Our central insight is to treat personas as positions in a space of behavioural traits, using the OCEAN framework to describe model personas in terms of Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism. We train low-rank adapters to amplify or suppress individual traits, and evaluate their effects using an LLM-judge calibrated against a human-validated panel, trait-specific multiple-choice benchmarks, and standard capability evaluations. Across six models from three families (4B-32B), we find that each adapter moves its target trait largely monotonically with scale, combines approximately additively with other adapters to construct mixed personas, and preserves performance on capability benchmarks at moderate scales. We further show that the induced trait axes affect safety-relevant behaviour in downstream evaluations: for example, moving along neuroticism and agreeableness axes affects frustration and sycophancy respectively. We also introduce an unsupervised psychometric pipeline that recovers four interpretable behavioural factors (tone, initiative, didacticism, epistemic caution) from model rollouts. Persona control can then be considered in terms of learning, scaling, and composing traits in weight space, providing a bridge between personality measurement, model editing, and safety.
Calibrated personality vectors transform an opaque safety phenomenon into a human-legible diagnostic profile by extracting activation directions for character traits from a single binary contrast, which can separate or steer behavior without establishing a calibrated scale.
Human personality theories characterize traits not as isolated attributes captured by a single score, but as stable individual tendencies expressed through the interplay among persons, situations, and behaviors. Existing studies of personality-related behavior in LLMs have primarily focused on outputs elicited under pe...
This work proposes LifeMem, a longitudinal memory framework that combines structured life-event retrieval with agent-specific parametric memory for experience integration, and shows that LifeMem improves alignment with human data in terms of response distributions, overall and within-group diversity, and patterns of wi...
Hexi Wang, Yu-Jia Zhou, Bangde Du et al.· 0 citations
This work proposes PRISM (Persona Reasoning with Inverse SFL-based Modeling), a psycholinguistically grounded framework that reformulates persona fidelity evaluation as a structured inverse inference task, providing a more reliable framework for persona fidelity evaluation.
Meng-Fan Li, Ze-Sheng Wei, Xuan-Hua Shi et al.· 1 citation
Digital health interventions often rely on static message templates for health behaviour support, which can struggle to sustain engagement over time. Large language models (LLMs) offer a promising alternative by enabling context-sensitive message generation with personality-trait-based language adaptation across repeat...
Dominik P. Hofer, David Haag, R. Islambouli et al.· Message Understanding Confer...· 0 citations
Benevolence bias is identified and measure, a small but consistent tendency for aligned LLMs to lean toward the kinder, safer, more socially approved answer on value-laden survey questions, and is easy to diagnose and straightforward to fix.
Yuanzi Li, Jun-Hao Wang, Minghui Liu et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.