It is found that responses in the expected target direction are frequently accompanied by changes outside descriptor-specific signal-level target sets, and the accompanying changes differ substantially across systems.
Abstract
Natural-language descriptions have become a flexible interface for controlling generated speech. Existing evaluations largely assess whether an output matches a prompt, but prompt matching alone does not reveal whether characteristics outside the intended change remain stable. We examine this distinction through a controlled paired audit of three speech-generation systems: CosyVoice3, VoxCPM2, and Fish-Speech-S2. The evaluation contains 5,940 outputs spanning six reference speakers, ten texts, three random seeds, and eleven conditions. Using acoustic, prosodic, content, and speaker measurements, we find that responses in the expected target direction are frequently accompanied by changes outside descriptor-specific signal-level target sets. This pattern remains among outputs whose target response exceeds baseline seed variation, and the accompanying changes differ substantially across systems. We further introduce VoDER-Cal, a training-free candidate selector that retains sufficiently strong target responses while favoring smaller off-target deviations. A three-candidate pool raises the joint success rate from 4.8% under single-sample direct generation to approximately 14% for all candidate-selection policies. Within the matched three-candidate budget, VoDER-Cal reduces held-out off-target deviation from 0.344 under target-only selection to 0.276 and improves listener-rated preservation. Preservation-sensitive evaluation therefore complements prompt-adherence evaluation, while candidate reranking offers a practical inference-time improvement. Code, configuration files, and analysis scripts are available at https://github.com/intelland/VoDER
Hear2Act is introduced, a unified evaluation protocol for text and spoken assistants with 480 persona-grounded scenarios, hidden user concerns, and objectively verifiable outcomes that show that prosody matters when lexical evidence is insufficient, and that audio-capable LLMs can recover information from speech but do...
Xin-Yi Liu, H. Nayyeri, Dilek Hakkani-Tur et al.· 3 citations· ⚡1
Overall, matched-text speech delivery should be treated as a first-class factor in Audio LLM safety evaluation by holding transcript content fixed and varying six speech-delivery presets whose acoustic attributes may co-vary.
The Speech-Unsupported Rejection Evaluation Challenge (SURE-Challenge) is defined for this admission step and identifies a pre-generation error mode missed by answer-only scoring.
This work compares the capability of generative LLMs under a five-condition prompt ablation against a fine-tuned DistilBERT token classifier at detecting self-repairs and suggests that a locally deployable encoder, given sufficient in-domain annotation, is a more plausible route to clinical self-repair detection than s...
R. Wu, S. Pugh, K. O'Connor et al.· medRxiv· 0 citations
Results from benchmarking four MOS predictors and four Audio-LLM judges reveal that MOS predictors collapse onto acoustic signal quality, while Audio-LLM judges show selective, prompt-dependent detection that does not generalise across all dimensions.
Oluwanifemi Bamgbose, Simon Rosen, J. Shah et al.· 0 citations
The resulting 82M-parameter model, Wayu-Paxa-TTS-Edge, enables on-device Thai TTS without reference audio and achieves the lowest pause-placement error and intra-word pause rates among the three systems.
Kunat Pipatanakul, Potsawee Manakul, Warit Sirichotedumrong et al.· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.