Vision-language models (VLMs) have made rapid progress in visual perception and increasingly support real-world tasks that depend on images. Many such tasks, however, require more than rec- ognizing what an image contains: a model must use visual evidence to make a complete decision whose parts jointly satisfy global constraints. We introduce COMPLEXITYWORLD, a benchmark of 390 tasks across 39 domain-inspired visual worlds and 29 decision categories. Each task is generated from a hidden structured specification, rendered as a visual scene, and scored by an exe- cutable verifier that accepts any feasible solution. Under direct inference, all evaluated models ex- cept GPT-5.6-Sol remain below 40% verifier ac- ceptance rate (VAR), while GPT-5.6-Sol reaches 75.6%. Performance improves substantially when the same decision information is made explicit in structured form, yet varies sharply across equiva- lent visual presentations. Agent scaffolds provide smaller, model-dependent gains. Together, these results reveal a persistent visual-to-decision bot- tleneck that additional inference alone does not remove.
Results show that process priors are most useful when aligned with the scene's specific decision boundary, motivating boundary-aware prior selection for process-grounded visual reasoning.
Yu-Yang Dai, Bo-Fei Huang, Hong-Bo Zhang et al.· 1 citation
VSI is not a universal best abstention signal; it is a sample-intrinsic indicator of vision-ignoring failure, best used as a conditional ensemble component.
An embodied scene question-answering (QA) interface in which vision never enters the language model is studied, showing the gain survives paraphrase, attributing it to decision-aligned computation rather than answer-string leakage, while novel judgment vocabularies bound its scope.
Many vision applications ask several independent, forced-choice questions about the same image. Visual Jev encodes the image and public context once, executes isolated question suffixes as a batch, and reads candidate probabilities from the backbone's language-model head. Across four benchmarks, answer-supervised post-...
Modality reliance in VLMs is not fixed, but varies across tasks, evidence structures, models, and evaluation settings, which shows that modality reliance in VLMs is not fixed, but varies across tasks, evidence structures, and evaluation settings.
This work introduces VBVR-Pro, a closed-loop testbed that makes native visual reasoning through generation trainable, verifiable, optimizable, and experimentally controllable, and identifies recurring failure modes of the prevalent VLM-as-a-judge paradigm.
Junhua Xu, Rui-Si Wang, Fanyi Pu et al.· 5 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.