Skip to content
Open access

Balancing Efficiency and Human Oversight in AI-Driven ESG Audits: The Roles of AI Automation and Decision Making

Oct 2026 · Journal of Risk and Financial Management · Vol 19, pp. 796 · 0 citations · 38 references

TL;DR

IT automation significantly improves audit efficiency, accountability, and transparency, and AI decision making within governance structures exerts positive effects on all three outcome dimensions, strengthening the overall impact of AI on ESG audit outcomes.

Abstract

The growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) audits has created new opportunities to enhance corporate governance through faster and more consistent assurance processes. However, concerns remain regarding accountability, transparency, and the role of human oversight in AI-assisted auditing. Prior research has predominantly examined AI adoption in traditional financial auditing, leaving its role in the more qualitative and judgment-intensive context of ESG assurance comparatively underexplored, particularly with respect to how AI decision-making authority should be balanced against human oversight. This study examines the effects of AI automation and AI decision making on audit efficiency, accountability, and transparency, while assessing the mediating role of human oversight. A quantitative research design was adopted, and data were collected from 150 professionals involved in ESG audit-related functions (including ESG auditors, compliance officers, sustainability managers, and AI governance analysts) across private, public, and non-governmental organizations, recruited through purposive and snowball sampling via professional networks, audit forums, and LinkedIn ESG groups. The data were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). The findings indicate that AI automation significantly improves audit efficiency, accountability, and transparency. Similarly, AI decision making within governance structures exerts positive effects on all three outcome dimensions. Furthermore, human oversight partially mediates these relationships, strengthening the overall impact of AI on ESG audit outcomes. These results suggest that AI enhances ESG auditing effectiveness, but its benefits are maximized when supported by strong governance and human supervision. The study contributes to the emerging literature on AI-enabled ESG assurance by demonstrating the importance of balancing technological efficiency with accountability and transparency in corporate governance.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access 2026

From AI Alerts to Accountable Decisions: A Governance Framework for Regulatory Compliance

The STAGE framework is proposed as a practical approach to maintaining human judgment and organizational accountability when integrating AI into regulatory compliance and focuses on whether organizations can use AI to identify risks while keeping qualified people responsible for interpreting alerts, making decisions, d...

Monisade Oluwagbemigun · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Auditing as a Governance Mechanism for Artificial Intelligence: Institutional Design, Accountability, and Ethical Oversight

The rapid diffusion of artificial intelligence (AI) across organisational and societal settings has heightened concerns about accountability, transparency, and ethical oversight. Existing governance mechanisms, including regulation and principle-based ethics frameworks, often struggle to address the scale, opacity, and...

Alexander Oluka · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Artificial intelligence and auditing: Legal and ethical implications for assurance providers

Artificial intelligence (AI) is changing audit practice by expanding analytical coverage, automating routine procedures, and supporting more continuous risk assessment. These benefits, however, also raise questions about accountability, explainability, professional judgment, data protection, and legal responsibility. T...

E. K. Asirifi, E. Ocansey · 0 citations
Review 2026

AI, Automation & Algorithmic HR: Bias, Trust, Agentic Systems, and the Transformation of Generalist Roles in the Indian Context

It is argued that while AI offers efficiency and scale, it simultaneously amplifies risks of discrimination, erodes perceived justice, demands new governance architectures, and necessitates a fundamental reorientation of HR competencies toward judgment, ethics, oversight, and human-centric capabilities.

Saloni Singhal Garg · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

A GOVERNANCE-ORIENTED PROMPT ENGINEERING FRAMEWORK FOR AI-ASSISTED INTERNAL AUDITING

A governance-oriented framework that links 13 audit-specific prompt types to the main phases of the internal audit lifecycle: planning, fieldwork, reporting, and follow-up is developed and indicates that structured prompting can improve repeatability, transparency, and professional skepticism.

Özden Şentürk · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Professional Judgment and AI Disclosure Governance in Audit and Sustainability Assurance: Public Evidence from the UK Big Four

Artificial intelligence (AI) is entering audit workflows while sustainability reporting expands the evidence subject to professional evaluation. This exploratory study examines how the UK Big Four publicly describe safeguards that keep AI-assisted work human-led, reviewable and accountable. The complete 2024 transparen...

Radosveta Krasteva-Hristova · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.