Skip to content

Diminishing Returns of Data in Sparse Autoencoders: Functional Behavior does not Guarantee Feature Reproducibility

Oct 2026 · 0 citations · 33 references
Computer Science Mathematics

TL;DR

This work studies how much activation data SAEs need by training four SAE architectures on three language models with budgets ranging from 5M tokens to a 500M-token reference, and measures two notions of convergence: functional behavior on standard evaluations and one-to-one reproducibility of learned features.

Abstract

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are typically trained on hundreds of millions to billions of activation tokens, yet little work has tested whether this scale is necessary. We study how much activation data SAEs need by training four SAE architectures on three language models with budgets ranging from 5M tokens to a 500M-token reference. We measure two notions of convergence: functional behavior on standard evaluations and one-to-one reproducibility of learned features. Functional data requirements are strongly metric-dependent: reconstruction often approaches the full-data reference at substantially smaller budgets, whereas feature reproducibility continues to improve with data. For Gemma-2-2B BatchTopK, the fraction of strictly matched features rises from 2\% at 5M tokens to 29\% at 50M. Data selection also matters: random sampling better preserves the original activation distribution and generally favors reconstruction, whereas diversity-based sampling frequently improves AutoInterp. A theoretical analysis separates statistical consistency of subsampled training from the stronger identifiability and optimization conditions required for one-to-one feature recovery. Our results show that SAE training can often be made far more data-efficient when budgets are matched to the goal, and feature-level claims are backed by explicit reproducibility checks, paving the way toward cheaper and more reliable SAE research.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Representation Redistribution in Sparse Autoencoders

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) decompose language model activations into sparse features, but prompt transformations designed to preserve the underlying request can redistribute activity across them. A feature change observed on one transformed prompt need not recur, and even a recurring change need not affect a downstream...

Zi-Ye Mei, Hao-Tian Ma · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Inference and learning in sparse autoencoders as natural gradient flow

Sparse autoencoders are widely used to uncover interpretable features in neural networks, yet reliable recovery remains difficult when features overlap or activate infrequently. These challenges involve both inferring which features explain an input and learning the dictionary that represents them. Here, we unify infer...

Hadi Vafaii, Tejas Rao, David Chanin et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Learning Computational Structure for Sample-Efficient Prediction

Statistical learning in high dimensions suffers from the curse of dimensionality. Fortunately, many functions of practical interest are compositionally sparse, meaning they admit a composition of local functions, each depending on only a few variables, allowing sample complexity to depend on local arity rather than amb...

Hang-Yu Zhou, C. Dovrolis, Stephen O. Mussmann · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Oct 2026

What Do Sparse Autoencoder Feature Discovery Scores Identify? From Activations to Interventions

Sparse autoencoder (SAE) features are typically discovered from how their activations co-vary with behaviour, yet they are often used through interventions such as steering or ablation. We take intervention attribution, the first-order effect of a specified intervention on the model output, as our estimand. For a broad...

Yi-Feng Guo, Yan-Ran Li, Xiang Chen · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Data Scarcity and Model Sparsity: Mixtures-of-Experts Overfit More to Repeated Data

This work addresses the adverse interactions between sparsity and data repetition, and presents evidence for the core mechanisms of overfitting and its potential remediation, and suggests promising avenues for future methods to reduce over-specialization in model parameters by disrupting memorization patterns.

Atindra Jha, Margaret Li, J. Leskovec et al. · 2 citations

Related blog posts

GPT-Lab Sep 3, 2026

Adaptive AI Agents in Construction Workflows

Adaptive AI agents can help make BIM data more machine-readable by navigating IFC models, interpreting inconsistent information, and mapping it to defined standards. In this blog, Alok Rawat shares findings from a real-world pilot in construction workflows. The post Adaptive AI Agents in Construction Workflows appeared first on GPT-Lab.

GPT-Lab Aug 28, 2026

We built an AI factory for HVAC control

What does it take to trust AI-driven HVAC optimization? Our AI Model Factory combines agents, machine learning, reinforcement learning and deterministic checks in a governed workflow designed for messy, real-world building data. The post We built an AI factory for HVAC control appeared first on GPT-Lab.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.