Skip to content
Review Open access

From Clues to Competence: A Comparative Study of Three Educational Puzzle Formats as Perceived Teaching and Formative Assessment Tools Among Undergraduate Health Professional Students.

Oct 2026 · Journal of Pioneering Medical Sciences · Vol 15, pp. 225-237 · 0 citations

TL;DR

Clinical Case Puzzles are most strongly endorsed for formative assessment; Diagnostic Riddles are optimal for vocabulary and lower-order recall; Medical Crosswords were designed to target higher-order clinical reasoning, although this was not independently measured in the present study.

Abstract

Background: Active learning strategies are essential in health professional education. Three novel educational puzzle formats: (1) Diagnostic Riddles, (2) Clinical Case Puzzles and (3) Medical Crosswords-were designed, implemented across four subject areas and comparatively evaluated among undergraduate health professional students as teaching and formative assessment tools. Methods: A within-subject (repeated-measures), comparative observational study (January-December 2025) enrolled 164 second-and third-year undergraduate students from the health sciences colleges of the University of Hail, Saudi Arabia. A pre-validated 30-item Likert questionnaire assessed perceptions across seven domains. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, repeated-measures ANOVA (or linear mixed-effects model), paired post-hoc comparisons with correction for multiple comparisons and chi-square/Cochran's Q tests as appropriate (IBM SPSS v.20). Results: Response rate was 100% (n = 164). Clinical Case Puzzles (Type 2) achieved the highest overall mean satisfaction score (4.84±0.36), followed by Diagnostic Riddles (Type 1; 4.77±0.41) and Medical Crosswords (Type 3; 4.63±0.48). One-way ANOVA revealed significant inter-format differences (F (2,489) = 8.42, p = 0.0002, η² = 0.033). Post-hoc Tukey HSD confirmed Type 2 was significantly preferred over Type 3 (p<0.001). Chi-square analysis confirmed that curriculum inclusion preference was significantly associated with puzzle format (χ² = 12.34, df = 2, p = 0.002). [EDITOR/AUTHOR NOTE: The F-, p- and χ²-values above were computed treating repeated observations from the same students as independent (one-way ANOVA/ordinary chi-square). Per Reviewer Comments 32-39 and 41-42, these must be recalculated using a repeated-measures ANOVA or linear mixed-effects model (and, if applicable, a repeated-measures categorical method) before resubmission; the values here are retained from the original submission pending that reanalysis]. Conclusions: All three puzzle formats were highly rated and positively perceived active learning tools. Clinical Case Puzzles are most strongly endorsed for formative assessment; Diagnostic Riddles are optimal for vocabulary and lower-order recall; Medical Crosswords were designed to target higher-order clinical reasoning, although this was not independently measured in the present study. A tiered, format-differentiated implementation strategy is recommended for health sciences curricula.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Oct 2026

Educational Crossword Puzzles as A Tool for Engaging Active Learning among Undergraduate Health Professional Students

Background and Aims: Health professional students are exposed to a vast number of terminologies and concepts within a short academic period, making it challenging to achieve sufficient practice and consistency for effective learning. This study evaluated undergraduate health professional students’ perceptions of the us...

Nida Suhail, S. Rao, B. V. Padmanabha et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Comparative analysis of short answer questions and multiple-choice questions in formative assessment of first-year medical students

MCQs were easier and yielded higher scores, whereas SAQs provided a more challenging assessment with comparable discrimination, and using both formats together may enhance assessment quality in undergraduate medical education.

A. M. Ammar, H. E. El Naggar, M. Ahmed et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Matric or Mirror? Exploring Cognitive and Institutional Drivers of Student Course Evaluations: A Mixed-Methods Study in Medical Education

To address this potential erosion in perceived utility, medical institutions must establish an explicit, closed-loop reporting system that visibly demonstrates constructive, longitudinal curriculum changes derived from student feedback to rebuild students’ trust in the process.

S. Agha, Bakhaitan Alumer, Samah Saad Salem et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Effectiveness of Structured Online Assignments on Academic Performance and Learner Perceptions among Undergraduate Medical Students in Community Medicine: A GRAMMS-Compliant Convergent Mixed-Methods Study

Strategically constructed and learner-controlled online assignments led to a statistically significant and moderate improvement in academics, however, institutional interventions that address the issues of technical infrastructure, assessment validity and topical diversity are required to enhance this pedagogy in Commu...

T. D., Shivasakthy Manivasakan, T. J et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

A Mixed-Methods Pilot Evaluation of Undergraduate Medical Students’ Perceptions of a Gameshow-Style Teaching Intervention: Implications for Continuing Professional Development

ABSTRACT Continuing medical education (CME) and continuing professional development (CPD) providers face a persistent challenge in engaging time-pressured clinicians through interactive, low-resource formats. Undergraduate medical education has traditionally relied on didactic teaching, which may not align with the rap...

Max Sullivan, Amber Sealy, Timothy R. E. Owen · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Beyond Multiple Choice: The Association between Diagnostic Reasoning Exams and Medical Student Learning Strategies

Students report more frequent use of study strategies more closely aligned with institutional learning objectives and the development of clinical reasoning skills when studying for DxR exams than when studying for MCQ exams.

Hope M. Cherian, Rachel Dockter, Rebecca L. Toonkel et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.