Abstract Real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) is a widely used method for gene expression analysis; however, its accuracy depends on the selection of stable reference genes for normalization. To date, no study has systematically identified suitable reference genes for primary human fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS) and lymph node stromal cells (LNSCs) in the context of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), despite the critical role of these stromal cells in disease pathogenesis. We evaluated the expression stability of 12 candidate reference genes in FLS and LNSCs subjected to various in vitro conditions, including inflammatory stimulation, senescence induction, and differentiation. Candidate genes were selected based on common usage and Genevestigator analysis of publicly available transcriptomic datasets. Expression stability was assessed using Clarida and RefFinder software, integrating geNorm, NormFinder, BestKeeper, and the comparative delta Ct method. The number and identity of recommended reference genes depended on cell type and experimental condition. In LNSCs, two genes, RPLP0 and POLR2G , were recommended across all tested conditions. In contrast, FLS exhibited condition-dependent variability, with POLR2G and TBP being recommended for untreated FLS. In contrast, combinations of three genes were recommended for FLS subjected to TNFαLTαβ stimulation ( EEF1A1 , NFIC and POLR2A ), senescence-related conditions ( EEF1A1 , GAPDH and NFIC) and adipogenesis ( POLR2G , EEF1A1 and TBP) . Comparison of normalization strategies in untreated FLS showed that reference gene choice influenced relative target gene expression patterns and their interpretation. This study provides the first systematic evaluation of reference genes for RT-qPCR normalization in human FLS and LNSCs. Our findings highlight the necessity of condition- and cell type-specific validation of reference genes to ensure accurate and reproducible gene expression analysis in studies of fibroblast biology and inflammatory disease.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The results show that the embedded industry has been able to apply agile methods in its development processes and that the appreciation of the agile methods and their individual practices appears to increase once adopted and applied in practice.
O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· IET Software· 238 citations· ⚡9
Consequences of happiness and unhappiness that are beneficial and detrimental for developers' mental well-being, the software development process, and the produced artifacts are found.
D. Graziotin, Fabian Fagerholm, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 236 citations· ⚡13
The Mobile-D approach is briefly outlined here and the experiences gained from four case studies are discussed, which helped develop an agile development approach for mobile application development.
P. Abrahamsson, Antti Hanhineva, H. Hulkko et al.· Conference on Object-Oriente...· 225 citations· ⚡18
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 22, 2026
“X-Hinges” helps design and 3D print items like lamps and gloves with an interactive twist: automatically embedded sensors that perceive and adaptively respond to human contact.
StudentSim is a research system for evaluating and improving AI tutoring tools before they are tested with learners. It models how individuals may engage with tutors, giving feedback to improve tutor performance across subjects like chess, writing, and mathematics. The post Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring appeared first on Microsoft Research.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 6, 2026