Oct 2026· ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst)
IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Abstract
The proliferation of IoT devices and rapid advances in AI models demand low-latency inference over continuous sensory streams. In practice, deployment faces two coupled bottlenecks: limited compute and memory on edge devices, and constrained, time-varying wireless bandwidth when cloud assistance is required. Existing approaches treat model placement as a static decision and therefore optimize computation and communication separately. Real-time edge intelligence instead requires computation--communication co-design rather than static model deployment. This dissertation presents five systems that jointly optimize computation and communication across two workload regimes. For CNN-based, single-pass perception pipelines over low-power radios, CLIO adapts transmitted feature size to time-varying bandwidth through progressive slicing. SPEX prevents delayed modalities from stalling inference by speculating over missing inputs and rolling back only when necessary. FLEET overlaps local execution with opportunistic offloading on duty-cycled radios and enables early exit through cloud-side multi-layer fusion. For vision–language and generative workloads, LiteVLM reduces on-device VLM latency through query-aware visual pruning, cloud-assisted token prioritization, and speculative decoding. MASQ addresses a refinement gap in cascaded offloading: once the local tier responds, the output remains unchanged until the cloud reply arrives. MASQ closes this gap by streaming prioritized visual evidence to a near-edge gateway for continuous anytime inference, escalating to the cloud only when cross-tier disagreement indicates true uncertainty. Taken together, these systems show that computation--communication co-design is a practical design principle for real-time edge intelligence, yielding better latency--energy--accuracy trade-offs than decoupled designs across the IoT–cloud pipeline.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The perception of the impact of agile methods is predominantly positive, and several challenge areas were discovered, but based on this study, agile methods are here to stay.
M. Laanti, O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· Information and Software Tec...· 260 citations· ⚡20
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 15, 2026
A new computational approach reveals how cells communicate to assemble into tissues. This could accelerate stem cell engineering, improve disease models, and inform therapies.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 8, 2026