Skip to content
Review Open access

Health-Worker Mentorship and Adherence to National Malaria Case-Management Guidelines in Zamfara State, Nigeria: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study

Sep 2026 · Journal of Life Science and Public Health · 0 citations · 14 references

Abstract

Effective malaria case management depends on diagnostic confirmation, appropriate treatment, accurate documentation, and timely referral. Although health-worker mentorship may improve adherence to malaria guidelines, evidence from security-affected settings remains limited. This study assessed the association between exposure to a three-month health-worker mentorship programme and adherence to national malaria case-management guidelines among primary healthcare workers in Zamfara State, Nigeria. A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted among 360 healthcare workers selected from 60 primary healthcare facilities using multistage sampling. Participants included 180 workers from mentorship-supported local government areas and 180 from non-supported areas. Data were collected using interviewer-administered questionnaires and a 10-item record-review checklist. Group differences were assessed using Pearson chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests, and unadjusted prevalence ratios (PRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Workers in mentorship-supported areas showed higher adherence for documenting fever (100.0% vs 61.7%; PR 1.62, 95% CI 1.45–1.82), conducting malaria rapid diagnostic testing (100.0% vs 41.1%; PR 2.43, 95% CI 2.04–2.90), documenting test results correctly (94.4% vs 28.3%; PR 3.33, 95% CI 2.64–4.22), and providing guideline-concordant treatment (78.9% vs 49.4%; PR 1.60, 95% CI 1.35–1.88). Diagnostic classification did not differ significantly between groups. This study contributes evidence on mentorship-supported malaria case-management implementation in security-affected settings. Exposure to mentorship was associated with improved performance on most adherence indicators; however, the cross-sectional, non-randomised design and group differences limit causal interpretation. Future evaluations should account for confounding, clustering, and commodity availability.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.