Aug 2026· Nature Genetics· Vol 58, pp. 2350 - 2360· 0 citations· 84 references
Medicine
TL;DR
FuncVEP, a family of variant effect predictors trained on diverse functional data to predict the functional impact of missense variants, provides a robust, scalable solution for variant interpretation, advancing both diagnostic precision and gene discovery.
Abstract
Prediction of missense variant effects remains a critical bottleneck in both research and diagnostic genetics. Current predictors typically rely on clinical outcomes or population patterns rather than direct measures of functional impact, leading to limited generalizability and data circularity. Here we present FuncVEP, a family of variant effect predictors trained on diverse functional data to predict the functional impact of missense variants. FuncVEP generalizes across datasets and outperforms 48 existing predictors across a wide range of benchmarks, improving accuracy from 78.8% to 84.6% on functional benchmarks and from 90.1% to 92.4% on clinical benchmarks. From a discovery perspective, we identified 210 new gene–phenotype associations involving 494 genes linked to inborn errors of immunity in the UK Biobank and the Mount Sinai Million Health Discoveries Program. FuncVEP substantially improved the discovery rate relative to state-of-the-art predictors. Overall, FuncVEP provides a robust, scalable solution for variant interpretation, advancing both diagnostic precision and gene discovery. This study presents FuncVEP, a tool trained on functional data to improve missense variant interpretation and identify new gene–phenotype associations in population cohorts.
Predicting how missense variants alter protein function is central to resolving the genotype-to-phenotype equation, a task now addressed by numerous computational predictors. The most accurate are increasingly opaque, however, limiting both their mechanistic value and their adoption in the clinic. Here we present QAFIs...
Shao-Pei Ye, Selen Özkan, Aitana Díaz-Vásquez et al.· International Journal of Mol...· 0 citations
It is found that this test to judge whether a computer program predicts whether a genetic variant causes disease is easier to pass than it looks, and about half the advantage held by programs trained on clinical data disappears once the gene pattern is removed.
Pleiotropic and monotonic effects of gene dosage are central to understanding comorbidities in developmental pediatric and psychiatric disorders, yet the underlying biological processes are not well characterized. Here we develop a functional burden analysis to investigate the association of all protein-coding copy-num...
Sayeh Kazem, Kuldeep Kumar, J. Yang et al.· Nature Communications· 0 citations
Different regions of genes perform distinct functions and vary in their importance to human health. Evolutionary intolerance provides a powerful means of identifying regions where disruptive mutations are under strong purifying selection, informing genetic disease discovery and variant interpretation. However, estimati...
Constantine Stavrianidis, Yun-Cheng Duan, Grace E. Rhodes et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
Machine learning-based annotation methods are increasingly used to assess the pathogenicity of genetic variants, but their performance at prioritizing variants for gene-level association testing remains poorly characterized. Here, to better understand and optimize for this use case, we assess variant annotations from...
Matthew Aguirre, Flaviyan Jerome Irudayanathan, M. Crow et al.· BMC Genomics· 0 citations
Assessment of several computational approaches using a dataset of pharmacogenomic variants with either clinical annotations or functional characterization by deep mutational scanning, with an additional focus on CYP2C9, a clinically relevant drug-metabolizing enzyme, indicates that computational models can complement i...
F. Pucci, Pauline Hermans, Matsvei Tsishyn et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.