Skip to content

Automated Dense Reward Function Design for Reinforcement Learning in Autonomous Driving

Oct 2026 · Preprints.org
Reinforcement Learning in Robotics

Abstract

Crafting reward functions remains a challenge in reinforcement learning, particularly in autonomous driving (AD), where safety, efficiency, and task completion must be balanced. We introduce a GPT-5.6-based revision of AD Reward Designer, a framework for generating interpretable dense reward functions from natural language goals and concise Pythonic environment descriptions. The initial reward generation requires no expert demonstrations or model fine-tuning. GPT-5.6 translates task requirements into executable reward code, which is checked before being used by a reinforcement learning algorithm. Policy rollout summaries and human feedback then guide iterative refinement of the reward terms and their weights. An optional demonstration-conditioned extension supplies expert and policy trajectories as additional context for reward design. We retain Highway-env and MetaDrive as the evaluation environments and PPO as the policy learning algorithm. The original experiments provide evidence for the feasibility of language-model-generated rewards; their numerical results are retained as historical evidence and are not reported as GPT-5.6 measurements. The revised GPT-5.6 configuration requires a new evaluation under the same task settings.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.