Skip to content
Preprint

AI-Augmented Inquiry and Regulation in Hybrid Systems: A Control Allocation Architecture for Preserving Epistemic Agency in Hybrid Human-AI Cognition

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 80 references
Physics Computer Science

TL;DR

The AIRIS architecture is a multi-level control allocation architecture specifying the conditions under which epistemic agency can be preserved in hybrid generative systems, reframing AI augmentation as a problem of control allocation in distributed generative systems.

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (genAI) systems are increasingly integral to epistemic processes such as hypothesis generation, explanation construction, and decision-making. Although they reliably enhance performance, emerging evidence reveals a metacognitive dilemma: as external generative capacity increases, internal monitoring, calibration, and cognitive engagement may decline. This reflects a redistribution of cognitive control within distributed human-AI systems that cannot be explained by automation bias or reliance on algorithms alone. We propose the AIRIS (AI-Augmented Inquiry and Regulation in Hybrid Systems) framework to analyze this dilemma and specify where regulatory intervention can counteract it. AIRIS is a multi-level control allocation architecture specifying the conditions under which epistemic agency can be preserved in hybrid generative systems. Drawing on distributed cognition, cognitive load theory, multimedia learning, and self-regulated learning, it identifies seven interacting mechanisms through which hybrid cognition may become destabilized, from delegation and calibration drift to motivational-affective drift. Five regulatory operators (Anticipate, Interrogate, Reflect, Integrate, and Synthesize) target internal generative engagement at points of emerging instability. The architecture does not itself improve learning; it specifies what must remain in place for genAI-supported work to sustain understanding, whether through instructional design, teacher guidance, or learners'own regulation. We derive testable propositions concerning the seven mechanisms and the five operators, reframing AI augmentation as a problem of control allocation in distributed generative systems. Beyond theory, AIRIS offers a research agenda, a design framework for genAI-integrated learning environments, and a conceptual toolkit for the governance of hybrid human-AI cognition.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

When Intelligence Becomes Agency: A Theory of Governed, Proactive Agency for Symbiotic AI Systems

A conceptual and formal framework for governed proactive agency is developed, organizing behavior across time through perception, intent, affective-conative appraisal, constraint, and feedback, and is intended to guide the development and evaluation of always-present personal assistants and embodied support systems tha...

J. Ferreira · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Epistemic dependence in AI-mediated learning

This critical-integrative review argues that the central educational question is not whether learners rely on AI, but whether that reliance preserves or displaces the epistemic work through which judgement develops, and proposes relational epistemic agency as the normative aim.

Yi-Ran Du, Yi-Xuan Yuan · 5 citations
Open access Aug 2026

The regulation paradox: agentic AI, bounded autonomy, and self-regulated learning in higher education

Bounded autonomy is proposed as a pedagogical governance principle that limits the scope, timing, transparency, contestability, and duration of AI intervention in education and separates four risks within the regulation paradox.

Mohammed Salah, Rudaina Al-Busaidi, Amna Al-Ghawi et al. · 2 citations
Aug 2026

Designing intentional AI-augmented learning: social learning theory extended through the human-machine-human model

The human-machine-human model offers a novel diagnostic framework for understanding why high completion rates often fail to translate into performance improvements and for helping organizations assess where AI-mediated learning will succeed.

Abhineet Sharma, Mamta Mohapatra · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

AI Sabbatical: A conceptual framework for cognitive sustainability in AI-augmented knowledge work

This study is among the first to conceptualize temporary non-use of AI as a governance mechanism, extending responsible AI governance beyond AI systems to the human capacities and organizational conditions required for sustainable AI-augmented knowledge work.

T. Anthuvan, Sunitha Prabhuram · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Counter-Inferential Behavior in Natural and Artificial Intelligent Agents

This study explores the emergence of counter-inferential behavior in natural and artificial cognitive systems, that is, patterns in which agents misattrib-ute empirical success or suppress adaptation, leading to epistemic rigidity or mal-adaptive stability. We analyze archetypal scenarios in which such behavior arises:...

Serge Dolgikh · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.