Skip to content
Open access

Sensitivity Analysis of a Simple Additive Weighting-Based Decision Support System for Strategic E-Learning Evaluation

Sep 2026 · sensi · 0 citations

TL;DR

This study designs a Decision Support System (SPK) using the Simple Additive Weighting method which is integrated with sensitivity analysis, and proves that the model not only functions as aranking tool, but also as a precise early warning system for university management to carry out data-driven preventive interventions.

Abstract

The implementation of e-learning often faces obstacles in the objectivity of student performanceevaluations which have an impact on the inaccuracy of managerial decision-making. This studyaims to design a Decision Support System (SPK) using the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW)method which is integrated with sensitivity analysis. Four main criteria were used: forum activity(25%), task accuracy (30%), evaluation value (30%), and duration of access (15%). Thesimulation results showed that the system succeeded in classifying students into three categoriesof adaptivity, with Citra (A3) being the highest ranked (score of 0.98). Crucial findings from the  sensitivity analysis showed that although the weight of the interaction was increased by 40%, theranking order remained robust, but the score in the passive student group decreased significantlyto 0.46 (below the critical threshold of 0.50). This proves that the model not only functions as aranking tool, but also as a precise early warning system for university management to carry outdata-driven preventive interventions.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

Implementation of a Decision Support System for High-Achieving Student Selection Using Simple Additive Weighting

A web-based decision support system using the Simple Additive Weighting method to rank 21 students based on academic performance, attendance, attitude, and participation, weighted 40%, 25%, 20%, and 15%, respectively, provides a structured and reproducible ranking aid based on school-defined criteria and weights.

P. Sari, Fauriatun Helmiah, Wan Mariatul Kifti · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Implementation of a Decision Support System Based on the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Method and Apriori Algorithm for Student Achievement Evaluation

Test results show that both SAW and Apriori achieved an accuracy of 87% compared to manual calculations, indicating that the combination of these two methods can provide consistent and reliable decisions.

Mochammad Bagus Priyantono, Deni Mahdiana · 0 citations
#software testing Open access Sep 2026

Development of a Decision Support System for Selecting College Majors Based on an Expert System Using the Forward Chaining Method

Purpose of the study: This study aims to develop a decision support system for selecting higher education majors based on users' personality characteristics using the RIASEC theory. The study also aims to analyze the software quality in terms of correctness, functionality, usability, and maintainability and to examine...

Cahyana, Nahrun Hartono · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Implementation of Decision Support System for Teacher Performance Analysis Using MOORA Method

The results demonstrate that the developed system generates rankings based on predefined criteria and weights using a standardized computational procedure, providing structured and transparent outputs, though improvements in learning quality require further longitudinal study.

Zakinah Aulia, Angga Suryadi · 0 citations

Penerapan Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution

The research results demonstrate that the TOPSIS method is capable of producing a more objective, transparent, and measurable assessment process, thus assisting leaders in effectively identifying the best educational staff.

Dini Setyorini, Helina Apriyani · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.