Skip to content
#generative ai #diffusion models Review Open access

Public-sector digital transformation in the age of generative AI

Aug 2026 · Discover Artificial Intelligence · Vol 6 · 3 citations · ⚡ 1 influential · 137 references

TL;DR

A systematic literature review of 125 peer-reviewed articles published between 2021 and 2026 to synthesise contemporary public-sector DT dynamics indicates that DT is predominantly conceptualised as a sociotechnical and public-value-oriented process shaped primarily by leadership, organisational culture and strategic alignment rather than technological investment alone.

Abstract

Digital transformation (DT) remains central to information systems and public administration scholarship, particularly amid the rapid emergence of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI). This study presents a systematic literature review of 125 peer-reviewed articles published between 2021 and 2026 to synthesise contemporary public-sector DT dynamics. Following the PRISMA 2020 reporting standard and thematic synthesis, the review maps conceptualisations of DT, identifies key organisational, technological and environmental drivers, and examines their implications for public value. The findings indicate that DT is predominantly conceptualised as a sociotechnical and public-value-oriented process shaped primarily by leadership, organisational culture and strategic alignment rather than technological investment alone. Organisational and managerial factors emerge as the most consistent predictors of transformation outcomes across diverse institutional contexts, while technological and environmental conditions influence the pace, direction and unevenness of implementation. Despite the rapid diffusion of AI and GenAI in government practice, only a limited proportion of the literature substantively engages with AI, and fewer studies address GenAI, large language models or foundation models, revealing a widening gap between technological developments and scholarly inquiry. Building on the established organisational-technological-environmental framework, the review identifies four additional explanatory dimensions: citizen co-production, digitally induced administrative burden, street-level administrative reconfiguration, and multidimensional public-value evaluation. The study concludes by identifying priorities for future research on GenAI governance, accountability and equity, while offering practical implications for public managers and policymakers pursuing AI-enabled public-sector transformation.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Aug 2026

Innovating public service delivery in Germany: What drives digital transformation at the local level?

Digital transformation is widely seen as a key dimension of public sector innovation, expected to reshape and improve service delivery. Yet, empirical developments often fall short of these expectations, particularly in local and decentralised public administrations. We employ a mixed methods design to investigate th...

Liz Marla Wehmeier, Philipp Gräfe · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Governing AI and Digital Platforms: A Systematic Literature Review of Multi-Sectoral Policy Decision-Making

The SLR demonstrates that effective AI and digital platform governance demands a holistic, context-sensitive approach that actively balances efficiency with justice, innovation with accountability, and risk with public value.

Susanti Sampe Tandung, Obel Obel, Ihda 'Ainaya Zulaikha et al. · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Digital transformation in Supreme Audit Institutions: an exploratory analysis of the Napoleonic model in the European Union

This study examines how Supreme Audit Institutions (SAIs) are undergoing digital transformation (DT) and explores the main drivers, organisational dimensions and effects associated with the integration of emerging and cognitive technologies into public sector auditing. The study adopts a qualitative comparat...

Luís Cracel Viana, Ana Lúcia Romão, Gustavo Fernandes · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Enterprise Architecture for Digital Transformation in a Fragile State: Evidence from a Mixed-Methods Case Study of Afghanistan

Digital transformation (DT) programmes in fragile states routinely produce fragmented systems, duplicated investment, and outcomes that diverge from strategic intent. Enterprise architecture (EA) is the discipline conventionally prescribed for these pathologies, yet its established frameworks presuppose institutional s...

Bilal Himmat, Amir Kror Shahidzay, Mohammad Rashid Sapai · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Exploring E-HRM as a catalyst for global digital transformation in organizations

Electronic Human Resource Management (E-HRM) has emerged as a strategic enabler of digital transformation; however, existing research remains fragmented, context-specific, and inconclusive regarding its implementation and outcomes across different institutional settings. This study synthesizes the extant literature to...

Aneerban Roy · 0 citations
Conference Open access Aug 2026

Human capital in digital transformation: a systematic review perspective

The findings provide an integrated overview of current scientific knowledge and highlight gaps in research across different industries and levels of analysis, suggesting future studies should explore less digitally advanced sectors and include individual, unit, and organizational level perspectives.

Vaida Petrauskaitė-Jocienė, Renata Korsakienė · 1 citation

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.