Skip to content

Switch-Reasoner: Learn When to Think in Multitask Mixtures via Reinforcement Learning

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.08572 · 0 citations · 60 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Switch-Reasoner is proposed, a GRPO-based framework that learns to adaptively select reasoning modes for MLLMs and introduces a dual-level regulation mechanism that balances the overall use of Thinking Mode and Direct Mode while providing sample-level supervision based on the relative benefit of the two choices.

Abstract

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) often follow a fixed Think-then-Answer paradigm, which is inefficient in heterogeneous multitask settings because simple inputs may not require explicit reasoning while difficult ones can benefit substantially from it. Learning when to think is also unstable during post-training, where imbalanced rollouts can drive the model toward always-thinking or always-direct behavior. We propose Switch-Reasoner, a GRPO-based framework that learns to adaptively select reasoning modes for MLLMs. It treats thinking as a virtual tool invocation and allows the model to either answer directly or invoke explicit reasoning before answering. To stabilize this decision, we introduce a dual-level regulation mechanism that balances the overall use of Thinking Mode and Direct Mode while providing sample-level supervision based on the relative benefit of the two choices. Experiments on 11 multimodal tasks show that Switch-Reasoner reduces unnecessary reasoning while maintaining strong performance, achieving a better accuracy-efficiency trade-off.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

AdaThinkV: Adaptive Thinking for Token-Efficient Video Reasoning

Variance Recovery Policy Optimization (VRPO) is introduced, which retains and progressively expands groups to recover informative signals from prompts that are difficult yet solvable and retains and progressively expands these groups to recover informative signals from prompts that are difficult yet solvable.

Jingqi Tian, Haoji Zhang, Lin Chen et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Learning When to Think: Adaptive Reasoning for Test-Time Compute Allocation

A reasoning model is built that adaptively chooses how much to reason for each problem, and the brief modes end up more accurate than \textsc{Long}, which shows that the router sorts problems by difficulty rather than at random.

Gijs Kassenaar, Zhao Yang, Vincent François-Lavet · 2 citations
#machine learning Preprint Aug 2026

Continual Reasoning Gym: Diagnosing and Harnessing Shared Reasoning in Continual RLVR

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) commonly post-trains reasoning models on multiple tasks, while rerunning multitask RLVR (MTRL) as new tasks are added makes capability expansion costly. We therefore study continual RLVR, which updates the existing model as each task arrives. The central question is...

Lirui Luo, Guo-Xi Zhang, Hong-Ming Xu et al. · 0 citations

Off-Context GRPO: Learning to Reason on Hard Problems using Privileged Information

Off-Context GRPO (OC-GRPO), a minimally modified variant of GRPO that uses guided rollouts but applies an importance-corrected objective to steer the update back toward the original unguided objective, avoiding the mismatch that destabilizes uncorrected guided training.

Priyank Agrawal, Ankur Samanta, S. Ghasemlou et al. · 1 citation
Jul 2026

MADA-RL: Multi-Agent Debate-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Parameter-Efficient Reasoning in Compact Models

A controlled study isolates the source of MADA-RL's gains: the counterfactual advantage produces the highest critic improvement rate of any model evaluated, indicating that trained critics learn to correct generator errors rather than to imitate them.

Martino M. L. Pulici, Cuong Xuan Chu, Evgeny Kharlamov et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

TurnSight: Turn-Level Hindsight Self-Distillation for Tool-Integrated Reasoning

TurnSight is proposed, a turn-level hindsight self-distillation framework that derives supervision directly from execution-conditioned hindsight and selects reliable supervision through cross-horizon directional agreement.

Changle Qu, Sun-Hao Dai, Hengyi Cai et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.