Skip to content
Open access

Usefulness of Prognostic Stage in High-Risk Early Luminal Breast Cancer

Jul 2026 · JMA Journal · Vol 9, pp. 900 - 908 · 0 citations · 14 references
Medicine

TL;DR

American Joint Committee on Cancer PS offers superior prognostic stratification compared to UICC AS in high-risk luminal breast cancer, and incorporation into clinical practice may enable more personalized treatment approaches, particularly when identifying candidates for adjuvant abemaciclib therapy.

Abstract

Introduction: Breast cancer remains the most prevalent malignancy among women worldwide, with prognostic outcomes and therapeutic responses differing considerably across subtypes. The conventional staging framework developed by the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC), based on the Tumor, Node, Metastasis classification, reflects anatomical stage (AS) but overlooks biological characteristics. To address this limitation, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) introduced the Prognostic Stage (PS) in its 8th edition, which integrates biomarkers including estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and histological grade (HG). This study aimed to assess and compare the prognostic utility of UICC AS and AJCC PS in patients with high-risk luminal breast cancer. Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent surgery for ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer at Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital from 2011 to 2018. High-risk classification was defined based on MonarchE trial criteria: axillary lymph node metastasis, tumor diameter ≥5 cm, HG3, or Ki-67 ≥20%. Staging was performed using both UICC AS and AJCC PS, and prognostic values were evaluated via Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results: Among 105 eligible cases, 43 (41%) were downstaged when reclassified from UICC AS to AJCC PS. While UICC AS failed to yield significant stratification in terms of invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), AJCC PS demonstrated significant prognostic discrimination (IDFS p = 0.014; DRFS p = 0.004). Conclusions: American Joint Committee on Cancer PS offers superior prognostic stratification compared to UICC AS in high-risk luminal breast cancer. Its incorporation into clinical practice may enable more personalized treatment approaches, particularly when identifying candidates for adjuvant abemaciclib therapy. Further validation through larger, prospective studies is warranted.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Assessing shift in breast cancer stage from the anatomical staging classification to the clinical prognostic staging system

These findings support routine adoption of biologically informed staging in South Africa and substantially reclassifies patients, especially among hormone receptor-positive and triple-negative subtypes, with direct implications for treatment planning.

Rahmiz R. Thomas, Tahlia Naidoo, Uchechukwu A. N. Izegbu et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Survival of breast cancer: the impact of screening and treatment in different countries of the world

This international team researched literature information as well as summarizing up-to-date opinions from global experts, including those with limited resources and war-torn regions, to suggest improved overall survival with the former, partly due to reduced treatment morbidity.

Lorent Sijarina, O. Alqaisi, Drilon Bytyçi et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Time-dependent prognostic impact of tumor grade in stage I-III breast cancers

Background Breast cancer (BC) mortality risk extends over decades; yet, the temporal prognostic patterns of histological grade across subtypes and stages remain unclear. Patients and methods Women with stage I-III BC diagnosed between 2000 and 2018 were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results regist...

M. Mariani, M. Ochocki, G. Bianchini et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

High Cancer Inflammation Prognostic Index Identifies Patients With Stage II Colorectal Cancer With Outcomes Comparable to Stage III

CIPI identifies biologically high-risk stage II CRC with long-term outcomes comparable to stage III disease among patients with normal CA19-9 levels, supporting its role as a complementary prognostic tool beyond conventional pathological staging.

Teppei Kamada, Yasuhiro Takano, Keisuke Goto et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Ten-year survival of women with invasive breast cancer by stage, molecular subtype, and grade combined: a population-based study

Abstract Background Stage at diagnosis, histologic grade, and molecular subtypes are established prognostic indicators for women with breast cancer (BC), but their impact on population-based survival estimates is poorly documented. This study assessed long-term BC survival trends according to these factors. Methods We...

Fabiola Giudici, D. Serraino, F. Puglisi et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.