This survey examines embodied memory as a mechanism for preserving decision-relevant information beyond the current observation, and provides a framework for understanding memory as an essential component of reliable, adaptive, and lifelong-horizon embodied intelligence.
Abstract
Recent advances in generative foundation models have expanded the capabilities of embodied AI, enabling increasingly general navigation, manipulation, and long-horizon task execution. However, effective interaction with dynamic environments requires more than only strong perception and reasoning: agents must act with partial knowledge and retain, retrieve, and update information from past observations, actions, and experiences. This survey examines embodied memory as a mechanism for preserving decision-relevant information beyond the current observation. We organize existing approaches along two complementary dimensions: six fundamental memory requirements, spanning world-state persistence, task progress, belief maintenance, and experiential learning; and eight architectural categories, including recurrent states, fast weights, visual and symbolic representations, spatial memory, and experience-based systems. We analyze their capabilities and limitations, and examine how existing benchmarks evaluate memory-dependent behavior, distinguishing genuine use of historical information from general task performance. Finally, we identify open challenges in selecting relevant experiences, maintaining consistent beliefs in changing environments, and consolidating knowledge across episodes. Our analysis provides a framework for understanding memory as an essential component of reliable, adaptive, and lifelong-horizon embodied intelligence.
Memory allows large language model (LLM) agents to use past experience, often stored as textual records, when responding to requests. For embodied agents that control robots, visual and spatial observations introduce a broader choice of memory modalities, affecting both the information available for subsequent tasks an...
Jun-Xiang Wang, Yu-Chen Liu, Yi Wu et al.· 0 citations
Under matched backbones, EMem achieves the best overall performance among the evaluated memory systems and improves both open-source and proprietary models, while EMem-8B further improves over its backbone.
Li-Zhou Liang, Xin-Yue Zhong, Miao Pan et al.· 1 citation
Spatial understanding is essential for embodied agents navigating and interacting with the physical world. As observations arrive incrementally, agents must reason in a streaming manner. Yet streaming understanding must also be closed-loop: task-relevant evidence may require both recalling past observations and activel...
Yu-Xi Wei, Wei Huang, Qi-Rui Chen et al.· 0 citations
MaP-WAM is introduced, a Memory-as-Plans framework that decomposes memory-dependent world-action modeling into memory-grounded planning and plan-conditioned execution, and uses long-term multimodal episodic context as planning-time evidence rather than repeatedly conditioning the executor on the full history.
Si-Zhe Zhao, Hao-Zhe Xie, Wei-Yu Zhao et al.· 3 citations
Findings support MemBodied as a practical alternative to expanding the policy context for history-dependent manipulation, a fixed-size episodic memory with two complementary components: an associative state that records interactions across policy calls and an episode anchor that preserves a compact representation of th...
Tej Deep Pala, N. Majumder, Bryce Goh et al.· 1 citation
Multimodal models and agents have emerged to enable AI systems to learn from and interact with the real world more like humans by integrating information across multiple modalities. However, enabling multimodal agents to continually acquire useful information from complex, heterogeneous multimodal data remains a signif...
Ming-Hao Guo, Qing-Yue Jiao, Xiu-Jin Liu et al.· 0 citations
Machine-learning networks can learn without detailed instructions from a designer. Those that do may offer insight into how the brain reorganizes itself during learning.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 29, 2026
Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.