2026· Freeside Europe Online Academic Journal· Vol 17, pp. 1-18· 0 citations· 13 references
TL;DR
It is argued that if the humanities are to remain vital, they must experiment with integrative pedagogical framings informed by multiliteracies and critical pedagogy, and position AI as a medium through which shared inquiry and creative-critical work can be reoriented.
Abstract
In the context of what Chad Wellmon has termed the “permanent crisis” of the humanities, the rise of generative AI within contemporary media cultures calls for a reconsideration of humanistic education and its purposes. Rather than treating AI as a threat to established pedagogical norms, this article approaches it as a force that makes newly palpable the mediated and relational conditions under which authorship and interpretation have always unfolded. It argues that if the humanities are to remain vital, they must experiment with integrative pedagogical framings informed by multiliteracies and critical pedagogy. Such approaches position AI as a medium through which shared inquiry and creative-critical work can be reoriented. By incorporating AI into analytical and artistic practice under conditions of constraint and reflection, educators can invite students to grapple with automated systems while strengthening capacities for accountable judgment exercised in dialogue with others within more-than-human ecologies of meaning. From this vantage point, AI appears as a charged site of negotiation that presses the humanities to clarify what they do, for whom, and under what conditions they might continue to matter.
It is argued that the most productive response to AI in the humanities begins with disciplinary redesign rather than with adoption or prohibition--and that the difficulty the humanities cultivate is not an obstacle to learning but its method.
Renuka Gusain· Arts and Humanities in Highe...· 0 citations
Teachers' epistemological authority is diminishing as they negotiate the hegemonic algorithmic communication, and they respond to the students' fear of cognitive degradation by reorienting from a "knowledge transmitting" communicative practice towards "ethical verifiers" and "empathetic listeners".
F. M. Gasa, H. Prabayanti, Novita Damayanti et al.· International journal of tec...· 0 citations
Regulation of artificial intelligence in education is currently formulated as principles and institutional obligations. UNESCO’s guidance on generative AI calls for a human-centered approach; the EU AI Act classifies several educational uses of AI as high-risk, and Russian policy frames the digitalization of schooling...
Александр Борисович Ткачев· Journal of Society, Policy a...· 0 citations
As generative artificial intelligence (AI) becomes embedded in everyday literacy practices, pre-service teachers (PSTs) must decide what work remains distinctly human in AI-mediated meaning-making. This qualitative case study investigates how PSTs enact boundary work with generative AI during a semester-long literacy e...
I. O'Byrne· Literacy Research Theory Met...· 0 citations
The ongoing debate over the implementation of generative AI in education highlights the need for deeper reflection on the purposes of education. Using Cory Doctorow’s concept of “enshitification”—which describes the decay of internet platforms as they exploit users—I draw an analogy to education and develop enshitifi...
Silas C. Krabbe· Philosophical Inquiry in Edu...· 0 citations
This article examines artificial intelligence (AI) as an interruptive interlocutor within a participatory arts-based inquiry. Drawing on work with adolescent mothers in Kibera, Kenya, I trace how large language model (LLM) dialogue became entangled with embroidery, reflexive writing, and posthuman theory as I struggled...
Sarah Cornette· Qualitative Inquiry· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.