Jan 2027· International journal of technology in education and science· 0 citations
TL;DR
Teachers' epistemological authority is diminishing as they negotiate the hegemonic algorithmic communication, and they respond to the students' fear of cognitive degradation by reorienting from a "knowledge transmitting" communicative practice towards "ethical verifiers" and "empathetic listeners".
Abstract
The present schooling system is currently facing a dual disruptive crisis, spurred by the encroachment of social media algorithms and generative Artificial Intelligence (AI). While these forces impact the way students learn and think about information, they also induce an epistemological overhaul in the ecology of instructional communication. Students, with their visual rhetorical frameworks from digital platforms and the use of AI for analytical processing, present an apparent disciplinary crisis for their educators-a communication crisis in disguise. Applying Karl Weick's Sensemaking theory, this paper examines school leaders and Guidance Counselors in Samarinda, Indonesia's understanding of these ambiguities and reconceptualization of their roles. Through qualitative case studies based on teachers' pedagogical narratives, this study shows that teachers' epistemological authority is diminishing as they negotiate the hegemonic algorithmic communication. They respond to the students' fear of cognitive degradation by reorienting from a "knowledge transmitting" communicative practice towards "ethical verifiers" and "empathetic listeners." A Human-AI symbiosis is being created with the machine as information provider and humans as ethical validators and empathic listener. Implications were made for the development of policies related to algorithmic communication literacy and the application of tactical empathy in the classroom.
It is argued that if the humanities are to remain vital, they must experiment with integrative pedagogical framings informed by multiliteracies and critical pedagogy, and position AI as a medium through which shared inquiry and creative-critical work can be reoriented.
Aikaterini Delikonstantinidou· Freeside Europe Online Acade...· 0 citations
This article investigates the negotiation of artistic and evaluative legitimacy following the introduction of generative artificial intelligence (gAI) tools in a university-level drawing course. By examining the lived experiences of ten art education students and three lecturers at the University of Education, Winneba...
Ebenezer Kow Abraham, T. Mensah, E. Buxton· Image & Text· 0 citations
This paper offers a critical, interdisciplinary examination of artificial intelligence (
AI
) as a theological mediator, arguing that
AI
systems do not merely transmit religious knowledge but actively reproduce gendered epistemic hierarchies embedded in their training data. Grounded in an African Technocultural...
Matthew Michael, Gesila Nneka Uzukwu· Journal of Religion in Afric...· 0 citations
With a promise of efficiency-related benefits, Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems are being rapidly integrated into educational practice, be it officially or not. Yet, a growing corpus of research highlights epistemic, pedagogical, and sociotechnical risks, such as bias, hallucination, surveillance, dependency, and t...
Lucas Guarise, Emanuel Felipe Duarte· Adjunct Proceedings of the 1...· 0 citations
As GenAI systems have moved from novelty to everyday use in research and learningpractices, higher education institutions are increasingly adopting them in the realms of“literacy”, “responsible use”, and “ethical awareness”. Such framings often assume strategicsimplifications: imagining ethics as a checklist of princip...
With $2.1 million funding from Google.org, the open-source Public Transit Intelligence Hub will unify public transit monitoring, operations, and passenger communication.