Skip to content
Review Open access

Red and processed meat consumption and the risk of pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis

Jul 2026 · Frontiers in Nutrition · Vol 13 · 1 citation · 60 references
Medicine

TL;DR

This finding indicates that increased red meat consumption may elevate the PC risk; therefore, daily red meat intake is recommended to be controlled.

Abstract

Background Previous studies suggest red and processed meat consumption may increase the risk of pancreatic cancer (PC); however, there is no consensus regarding the associations. A systematic review and meta-analysis were therefore performed to explore the relationship between red and processed meats and PC risk. Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science for articles up to April 13, 2026, using random-effects models to calculate relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs, restricted cubic splines for dose-response relationship, and subgroup/meta-regression for heterogeneity. This systematic review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42022384026; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=384026). Results Sixteen articles with 1,959,527 participants and 8,856 PC cases were included. There was a 16% increased risk of PC found in the highest versus lowest red meat consumption levels (RR = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.02–1.31). A linear association was observed between red (P non-linear = 0.656) and processed meats (P non-linear = 0.857) and PC risk, with a 10% increase in the risk of PC for each additional 100 g/d of red meat consumption (RR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.00–1.21). For processed meat products, no significant association with PC risk was found. Conclusion This finding indicates that increased red meat consumption may elevate the PC risk; therefore, daily red meat intake is recommended to be controlled. No evidence links processed meat to PC risk.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Jul 2026

The association between coffee consumption and esophageal cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current observational evidence

This meta-analysis found no statistically significant association between coffee consumption and esophageal cancer risk and the available evidence, of low certainty, does not support coffee as a major risk factor.

Yi-Wei Zhao, Zi-Xin Cai, Jing-Jing Zhang · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Association Between Dietary Total Fat and Cholesterol Intake and Pancreatic Cancer Risk: A Dose–Response Meta-Analysis of Cohort and Case-Control Studies

Dietary cholesterol and total fat intake were not associated with PC risk in cohort studies, whereas case–control studies suggested a positive association between cholesterol intake and PC risk.

Syed O. Ahmad, M. Umair, U. Ali et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Dietary Pattern and Risk of Thyroid Cancer: A Systematic Review

Dietary patterns rich in vegetables, fruits, fish, lean meat, dairy products and unsaturated fats were significantly associated with reduced TC risk, whereas starchy foods, seafood, seaweed, processed meats, instant foods, fast food and Western patterns increased risk.

Y. G. Nagashima, A. A. Soares, G. Piuvezam et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

TPTh 9.06 Magnesium Intake and the Risk of Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

A possible protective role for magnesium is supported and potential biases warrant cautious interpretation, and these findings support a possible protective role for magnesium and highlight the need for further large prospective studies.

Essam Rama, Yusef Ibraheem, David Wong et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.