HiF4 is established as the enabling format for end-to-end FP4 RL post-training, and Rollout Residual Quantization (Rollout-ResQ) is established as the activation-side mechanism that makes the gap to BF16 closable.
Abstract
We present, to our knowledge, the first end-to-end FP4 RL post-training, in which both the rollout and training policies, including their forward and backward passes, operate at 4-bit precision. A systematic study reveals that the dominant source of degradation in FP4 RL is not training-side quantization error but rollout activation quantization: outliers stretch the dynamic range so far that a large number of activation values underflow to zero under FP4. Counterintuitively, restoring the training policy to higher precision while keeping the rollout in FP4 makes accuracy worse than full FP4 baseline, exposing rollout-training mismatch as the principal failure mode and ruling out standard pretraining-style fixes. We address this with Rollout Residual Quantization (Rollout-ResQ): a single residual correction term constrained to a hardware-friendly sparsity pattern, added only to the FP4 rollout matmul -- a lightweight correction that recovers most of the precision lost to outlier-driven underflow without inflating the rollout's compute footprint. On Qwen2.5-3B and Qwen2.5-Math-7B, Rollout-ResQ paired with the HiFloat4 (HiF4) format -- whose three-level hierarchical scaling preserves resolution under FP4's tight 4-bit budget -- closes the accuracy gap to BF16 from 4.9% to 1.1%, bringing fully quantized FP4 RL within striking distance of full precision. Applied to the open-standard MXFP4, the same recipe narrows the gap from 13.6% to 5.3%, revealing that FP4 format choice is a key factor that determines the ceiling on recoverable accuracy. Together, these results establish HiF4 as the enabling format for end-to-end FP4 RL post-training, and Rollout-ResQ as the activation-side mechanism that makes the gap to BF16 closable.
Real-Q (Real-time E2E-loss Aligned LLM Quantization), a novel PTQ paradigm that breaks this compromise: instead of diluting the objective for the sake of analytic tractability, REAL-Q targets an end-to-end-aligned surrogate of the global loss and refines it via fine-grained, dynamic Block-wise Gradient Descent applied...
Qian Zhang, Yao-Ming Li, Zheng Tan et al.· 0 citations
The sample efficiency and scalability of RL post-training for video MLLMs and introduces OraRL, a decoupled advantage estimator that scales with model size and data, surpassing its backbone from 0.8B to 9B and GRPO up to 100k prompts.
Yun-Heng Li, Guo-Hong Mu, Hao Li et al.· 1 citation
QUASAR is introduced, a QAT method that continuously performs lightweight, loss-aware reconstruction in the training loop to lower the loss floor and improve the resulting low-bit model, establishing QUASAR's objective as a principled optimization target.
Vincent Counathe, Ben Athiwaratkun, C. De Sa et al.· 1 citation
An end-to-end system for large-scale online draft co-training that achieves strong scaling at 256K tokens with significant memory savings over prior work, and the PP transport incurs modest overhead.
A simple modification to supervised fine-tuning, TailSFT, which filters out already fit sequences during training, thereby focusing learning on under-modeled regions, or the tail, of the data distribution, and introduces a lightweight diagnostic for identifying settings where TailSFT is most likely to help.
Sadhika Malladi, Samy Jelassi, Dylan J. Foster et al.· 3 citations
Comparing full-precision and quantized forward passes, and identifying two mechanisms that characterize pretrained quantization robustness, these mechanisms explain why quantization error that passes through numerous layers can still produce only small output changes, and are verified across models and quantization set...
Yu-Xiang Chen, Michael Beyer, Jun Zhu et al.· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.