Skip to content
#federated learning Open access

Progressive Collaboration Pruning for Federated Learning

Nov 2026 · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · pp. 683-693 · 11 references
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data

Abstract

Collaboration-based personalized federated learning (Co-PFL) mitigates data heterogeneity by enabling clients to selectively exchange knowledge through a learned collaboration graph. Despite their success, existing Co-PFL methods often update collaboration weights mainly from pairwise similarity, which can produce graphs that are either overly sparse and hinder knowledge propagation or overly dense and weaken personalization, leaving graph connectivity largely uncontrolled. In this paper, we propose FedPGP, a Co-PFL framework that explicitly schedules collaboration from dense to sparse over training rounds, enabling clients to first exploit broadly shared knowledge and then refine specialized knowledge aligned with their local distributions. FedPGP builds on a connectivity-aware similarity regularization that jointly accounts for global graph connectivity and client-model similarity, together with an efficient greedy pruning rule that removes edges with the least contribution to the regularized objective. We further present FedPGP+, a module-specific extension that learns different collaboration graphs for different model modules, allowing collaboration intensity to vary along model depth. Extensive experiments across diverse non-IID settings show that FedPGP and FedPGP+ consistently outperform state-of-the-art Co-PFL baselines, achieving up to 5.52% absolute accuracy improvement, while producing interpretable dense-to-sparse collaboration schedules.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.