Aug 2026· Expert Review of Medical Devices· Vol 23, pp. 1171 - 1186· 0 citations· 50 references
Medicine
TL;DR
This work proposes nine operational measures - covering transparency-oriented risk and change control, traceability, subgroup and independent validation, usability-based explainability, calibrated clinical evaluation, structured labeling, version-controlled updates, and regulated end-of-life data handling - to support regulatory readiness, calibrated clinical trust, and safe real-world integration of AI in healthcare.
Abstract
ABSTRACT Introduction Transparency has emerged as a foundational condition for trustworthy Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare. Despite its centrality, practical approaches to systematically operationalize transparency across the entire lifecycle of AI-enabled medical devices remain fragmented and insufficiently structured. This work addresses this gap by proposing a lifecycle-oriented operational approach to guide the consistent implementation and evaluation of transparency in AI-based medical technologies. Areas covered A narrative synthesis of regulatory texts, international standards, and scientific literature related to software as a medical device (SaMD), the EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR), the EU Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act), data-protection rules, and relevant ISO/IEC guidance. Using a SaMD lifecycle framework, we mapped transparency requirements to practical development, validation, and governance activities across ideation, data and design inputs, risk management, implementation/verification, technical and clinical validation, market placement, maintenance, and disposal. Expert opinion Transparency must be engineered as a lifecycle property, not an afterthought. We propose nine operational measures – covering documented design assumptions and datasets, transparency-oriented risk and change control, traceability, subgroup and independent validation, usability-based explainability, calibrated clinical evaluation, structured labeling, version-controlled updates, and regulated end-of-life data handling – to support regulatory readiness, calibrated clinical trust, and safe real-world integration of AI in healthcare.
The proposed Lifecycle-Integrated Healthcare AI Governance Framework (LIHAG), a four-layer deployment-oriented governance model integrating technical robustness, ethical safeguards, regulatory compliance, regulatory compliance, and human oversight as interdependent dimensions of responsible AI deployment is proposed.
Shehu Mohammed, Neha Malhotra, Sourabh Kumar· AI and Ethics· 0 citations
A compliance-by-design framework is proposed that translates overlapping legal requirements into a set of auditable governance artefacts covering system classification, regulatory mapping, data governance, validation, human oversight, conformity assessment, post-market monitoring, and change control.
Qaiser Khan, A. Saeed· Frontiers in Digital Health· 0 citations
A multi-layered governance model is proposed in which the four accountability layers operate through continuous feedback loops, enabling a lifecycle-oriented approach to the responsible development and deployment of AI in the UK healthcare system.
M. Unver, I. Ogu· The Paris Journal on AI &...· 0 citations
This scoping review examined the ethical and regulatory issues surrounding AI-enabled SaMD across jurisdictions and across the product lifecycle, drawing together peer-reviewed literature, standards, and official guidance.
Shaharyar Ahsan, Vivian Annastasia Chinyem Obi, Danish Noor et al.· Clinical Therapeutics· 0 citations
PURPOSE
Medical devices are a mainstay in modern healthcare, supporting the diagnosis, monitoring, treatment, and management of acute and chronic conditions. Rapid technological innovation, increasing software dependence, growing connectivity, and the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled systems have expan...
Shabnam Vaezzadeh, Charles Oyesile, Nicole Barber et al.· Clinical Therapeutics· 0 citations
A structured GDPR-compliant data science workflow framework is proposed that enables organizations to balance analytical effectiveness, regulatory compliance, and human-centered principles while fostering trustworthy, transparent, and sustainable Artificial Intelligence for real-world digital innovation.
N. Santoso, Dewi Khairani, S. Masruroh et al.· Journal of Orange Technology· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.