Aug 2026· Computational Linguistics· pp. 1-31· 0 citations
Abstract
We present a systematic evaluation of Large Language Models (LLMs) in translating classical descriptions of phonological and morphophonological change from Old Indo-Aryan (Sanskrit) to Middle Indo-Aryan (MIA) into the standard notation of modern historical linguistics. Drawing on Vararuci’s Prākṛta Prakāśa (c. 4th century CE) and English translation of Bhāamaha’s commentary (c. 6th century CE), we construct a dataset of 470 phonological and morphophonological rules extracted from these sources using LLMs followed by manual curation. Out of these rules, we compile a benchmark of 216 sound-change rules with example reflexes. Our pipeline integrates Optical Character Recognition (OCR) of non-digitized historical texts, manual gold-standard curation, and LLM-based translation of rule descriptions into contemporary phonological rule notation. Evaluation across several recent LLMs shows accuracies up to 86% on this challenging formalization task. Models incorporating explicit reasoning mechanisms consistently outperform non-reasoning variants, underscoring the importance of reasoning in linguistic formalization. Error analyses reveal systematic weaknesses in modeling complex conditioning environments. We further show that the extracted sound laws generalize well across a broader range of MIA languages. Overall, this work illustrates how contemporary LLMs can engage with millennia-old linguistic scholarship by systematically translating and structuring classical rule descriptions into modern formal representations.
The notable findings suggest that LLMs often make basic errors of grammar and semantics, and highlight the limitations of current LLMs as a reliable source of content generation and information retrieval for low-resource languages.
Farah Adeeba, A. Khan, Rajesh Bhatt et al.· 0 citations
The results characterize both the capabilities and limitations of current LLMs for potential integration into AI-assisted expert workflows: LLMs may support intermediate stages of grammar development, but human linguistic expertise remains central to analysis, validation, and refinement.
J-PragEval-v0 is introduced, a minimal-pair benchmark isolating four such phenomena from surface fluency, and Pragmatic Representation Steering is specified, a parameter-free inference-time method that edits residual-stream activations along the class-mean-difference directions probing identifies.
Fragment-Shot Prompting is introduced, a novel few-shot prompting method that aims to retrieve examples for every word occurring in the sentence to be translated, illustrating their use and meaning in context.
Samuel Frontull, Thomas Ströhle· International Conference on...· 0 citations
A reproducible study of Cross-lingual Natural Language Inference (XNLI) for Nepali using XLM-RoBERTa base, comparing full fine-tuning against parameter-efficient Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA).
Amir Shapkota, Sachee Ghimire· Proceedings of International...· 0 citations
It is suggested that LLMs can serve as auxiliary annotators for sensitive-language detection in historical materials, provided that human oversight and contextual interpretation remain central to annotation workflows.
Ya-Hui Zhao, Clemencia Siro, L. Hollink et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.