Skip to content

Bone Ring Grafts Versus Non-Resorbable Membrane GBR for Vertical Ridge Augmentation: A Prospective Cohort Study

Jun 2026 · Oral Health & Preventive Dentistry · Vol 24, pp. 481 - 488 · 0 citations · 28 references
Medicine

TL;DR

The bone-ring graft technique was associated with greater vertical bone gain and a lower incidence of membrane exposure compared to GBR using a non-resorbable membrane, and further studies with longer follow-up are required to confirm these findings.

Abstract

Purpose Vertical alveolar bone defects often require advanced augmentation techniques to enable successful implant placement. The aim of this study was to compare short-term vertical bone gain following two approaches: the bone-ring graft technique and guided bone regeneration (GBR) using a non-resorbable membrane in patients with vertical alveolar deficiencies. Materials and Methods A prospective cohort study was conducted involving 30 systemically healthy adult patients with posterior mandibular vertical bone defects measuring ≥4 mm. Participants were assigned to one of two treatment groups: Group A received the bone ring in conjunction with titanium implants and a resorbable collagen membrane; Group B was treated with allogeneic bone grafts and titanium-reinforced dense polytetrafluoroethylene (d-PTFE) membranes. Radiographic evaluations were performed at baseline, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and periapical radiographs. The primary outcome was vertical bone height gain. The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics Version 28.0. Results Group A demonstrated statistically significantly greater vertical bone gain at all postoperative intervals: 9.1 mm at 1 week, 10.6 mm at 1 month, and 9.7 mm at 3 months, compared to 7.8 mm, 7.0 mm, and 6.9 mm, respectively, in Group B (p < 0.0001). Plaque index scores were comparable between groups, with no statistically significant differences observed in postoperative swelling or infection rates. However, membrane exposure was statistically significantly more frequent in Group B at all follow-up visits (p ≤ 0.02). Conclusion The bone-ring graft technique was associated with greater vertical bone gain and a lower incidence of membrane exposure compared to GBR using a non-resorbable membrane. Further studies with longer follow-up are required to confirm these findings.

View source

Similar papers

#software testing Open access Sep 2026

Comparative Evaluation of Bone Ring versus Particulate Bone Graft using CBCT in Buccal Bone Augmentation with Simultaneous Implant Placement: A Randomised Controlled Trial

The Bone Ring Technique (BRT) is a newer viable option for restoring complex defects around dental implants with three-dimensional bone augmentation with significant height and width augmentation of buccal bone.

Priyadharshini Annamalai Senthur Pandian, Aniz Amanullah, Lakshmiganthan Mahalingam et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Cleft Alveolar Bone Grafting Using Mandibular Symphyseal Bone Graft and Resorbable Collagen Membrane: A CBCT-Based 3-Dimensional Morphometric Analysis.

Mandibular symphyseal bone grafting combined with a double-layer resorbable collagen membrane yielded favorable radiographic outcomes, with substantial reduction of alveolar cleft defects and satisfactory bone bridge formation in this retrospective cohort.

A. S. Budihardja, Dimas Satria Putra, Lia Hapsari Andayani · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Alveolar ridge preservation using an intentionally exposed xenogeneic collagen matrix seal in sockets with varying proportions of vertical bone resorption: a pilot study.

Within the limitations of this study, intentionally exposing the xenogeneic collagen matrix seal yielded comparable outcomes in non-contained and contained sockets, which may reflect the material's ability to reduce the adverse effects of socket-wall resorption.

Xinyi Zhou, Yuping Hong, Yang Yang et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Comparative Effectiveness of Vertical Ridge Augmentation Techniques for Dental Implant Treatment: A Systematic Review

While DO provides the greatest vertical bone gain, the GBR techniques might be a more clinically practical option, however, future well-planned RCTs to identify effective vertical bone augmentation techniques are still warranted.

Patiphon Tangjitlikhitsakul, Chanchai Wongchuensoontorn, Marnisa Sricholpech et al. · 0 citations