Skip to content

U-Lens: Supporting User Uncertainty Management in Long-Form LLM Responses

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.10604 · 0 citations · 111 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

U-Lens improves verification efficiency and effort allocation, reduced perceived workload, and strengthened support across all three stages of uncertainty management, and reframes uncertainty support for generative AI from text-centered cues to a user-centered process of interpreting, evaluating, and acting on uncertainty.

Abstract

Uncertainty can appear throughout LLM-generated text (e.g., questionable claims, ambiguous terms). Prior work largely focuses on making such uncertainty visible through cues such as confidence scores, but seeing uncertainty is not the same as managing it. Through a formative study, we examine uncertainty management across interpretation, evaluation, and decision. From these insights, we derive design guidelines for uncertainty target representation, evaluative explanation, response guidance, and interactive presentation. We instantiate them in U-Lens, an uncertainty-management system that organizes uncertain information into contextual inspection targets, prioritizes them, and links each to evaluative context and response options. In an 18-participant within-subjects study comparing U-Lens with a confidence-cue baseline, U-Lens improved verification efficiency and effort allocation, reduced perceived workload, and strengthened support across all three stages. This work reframes uncertainty support for generative AI from text-centered cues to a user-centered process of interpreting, evaluating, and acting on uncertainty.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Review Sep 2026

Knowing Is Not Enough: Information Retrievability as a Precondition to Effective LLM Oversight

This work develops an alternative, retrieval-based account of human oversight and posit that error detection is more effective when oversight-relevant information is accessible to users at the moment of review, and shows that self-generated explanations improve error detection and strengthen recall of verification-rele...

Xin-Yu Fu, N. Ramasubbu, D. Galletta · 0 citations
Book Open access Sep 2026

Beyond Exploration: AI-facilitated Information Visualization Structure for Complex Context Exploration and Decision-Making in Environmental Sustainability

Investigation of how different information visualization structures shape sustainability planning by comparing three interfaces refine the design of AI-enhanced decision support tools for personal sustainability and other multi-criteria personal informatics domains.

Qi-Ming Sun, S. Hsiao, Shih-Yi Chien · 0 citations
Book Open access Sep 2026

The XAI-Seeking Principle: Structuring Explainability for LLM-Mediated Decision Support

The XAI-Seeking Principle (XSP) is introduced, a hypertextual design principle that structures explainability as linked abstraction layers: overview-links connect low-level evidence to higher-level summaries, while detail-links preserve inspectable evidence.

Valentin Grimm, J. Rubart, Eelco Herder et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

UncertaintyVis: Preserving Linguistic Uncertainty in Automated Text-to-Chart Generation

This work presents UncertaintyVis, a system that preserves linguistic uncertainty during automated chart generation by mapping each category to chart-specific visual encodings that signal uncertainty without disturbing the spatial integrity readers rely on.

Songheng Zhang, Emily Aurelia, Anthony Tang · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Anchoring Bias in LLM-as-a-Judge Systems: Prior Scores Compromise Evaluation Independence

It is shown that prior scores, even when included only as context metadata, anchor judgments and systematically shift ratings toward their values, and effective mitigation must be validated for the intended model and task or domain.

A. Kapetanović, Kemal Altwlkany, Andro Merćep et al. · 1 citation
#natural language process... Preprint Sep 2026

The Analyst in the Prompt: Role, Retrieval, and Memory Biases in LLM Financial Analysis

This work compares persona-conditioned retrieval, neutral retrieval, and memory-framed context to separate the effect of evidence selection from the effect of interpretation and finds that most user-context spillover comes from how models interpret the same evidence under different roles, rather than from retrieving di...

Ahmed Asaad, Amr Mohamed, Yang Zhang et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 7, 2026

Discovering the value of humanistic inquiry

Students in MIT’s Concourse program delve deeply into the human condition, debate challenging questions, and learn to develop judgment about issues that can’t be quantified.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.